Re: [HACKERS] SSL BIO wrappers

2008-12-09 Thread Tom Lane
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The logic in it is identical to the original import of code in OpenSSL. > It originally had #ifdefs around how the BIO interface worked. That was > tidied up in a commit back in 2001. I think it's fair to say it's been > pretty stable. Fair enough. >

Re: [HACKERS] SSL BIO wrappers

2008-12-09 Thread Magnus Hagander
Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Attached patch replaces the SSL BIO wrapper code we have now, with one >> that directly calls the send() and recv() functions instead. THis means >> that they get passed through the rewrite macros to our internal >> functions on Win32

Re: [HACKERS] SSL BIO wrappers

2008-12-09 Thread Tom Lane
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Attached patch replaces the SSL BIO wrapper code we have now, with one > that directly calls the send() and recv() functions instead. THis means > that they get passed through the rewrite macros to our internal > functions on Win32, and I think this wil