On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 19:56, Joe Conway wrote:
> When returning "setof record", the column definition must exist in the
> query, and must match what ultimately is returned. This means that
> whatever logic you use in your application to write the sql statement
> must be able to derive the appro
Katsaros Kwn/nos wrote:
Either set it to: "setof _some_predifined_type" or set it to:
"setof records" and then define the expected results with "as(attr1
type, ..., attr_n type)".
Right?
Correct. Except it should be "setof record", not "setof records".
If these are indeed the only ways, is it po
