Re: [HACKERS] SRF's + SPI

2005-04-01 Thread Tom Lane
"Eric B. Ridge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The tuplestore stuff sounds like the right solution, but in the > interests of providing a quick patch to my production environment does > it makes sense to make a copy of the SPI_tuptable during the first-call > of the SRF (allocated in the SRF's me

Re: [HACKERS] SRF's + SPI

2005-04-01 Thread Eric B.Ridge
On Apr 1, 2005, at 3:55 PM, Tom Lane wrote: "Eric B.Ridge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Like I said, everything usually works without problems, but from time to time it crashes. If you rebuild with --enable-cassert, does the crash get more reproducible? Indeed. Every time. This is now the default

Re: [HACKERS] SRF's + SPI

2005-04-01 Thread Tom Lane
"Eric B.Ridge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Like I said, everything > usually works without problems, but from time to time it crashes. If you rebuild with --enable-cassert, does the crash get more reproducible? (Personally I would never consider developing any backend C code without that tur