Re: [HACKERS] Rome university

2006-05-02 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 04:31:14PM +0200, letizia leo wrote: > > and the doubt is the following: how is it possible that -line 144- Xmin > is the current transaction ( i.e. it has created this tuple, it is > holding an exclusive lock on it since it has not committed yet) and > that > -line 1

Re: [HACKERS] Rome university

2006-05-02 Thread Alvaro Herrera
letizia leo wrote: > and the doubt is the following: how is it possible that -line 144- Xmin > is the current transaction ( i.e. it has created this tuple, it is > holding an exclusive lock on it since it has not committed yet) and > that > -line 149- there is a different (?) transaction that