Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-05 Thread Bruce Momjian
Yes, now it is Digital/HP/Compaq. Updated to existing Tru64 entry. Ports list updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Alessio Bragadini wrote: > On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 00:40

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-05 Thread Bruce Momjian
Dave Page wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@;candle.pha.pa.us] > > Sent: 05 November 2002 03:18 > > To: Sean Chittenden > > Cc: Tom Lane; Larry Rosenman; PostgreSQL-development > > Subject: Re:

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-05 Thread Alessio Bragadini
On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 00:40, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Ports list updated: > > http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html Please note that you have an entry for Digital Unix and one for Compaq Tru64 while in fact they are the same OS that went through a whirlwind of

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-05 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@;candle.pha.pa.us] > Sent: 05 November 2002 03:18 > To: Sean Chittenden > Cc: Tom Lane; Larry Rosenman; PostgreSQL-development > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms > > > > Port

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-04 Thread Bruce Momjian
Ports list updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Sean Chittenden wrote: > > >> Or at least it's *trying* to apply it for 4.7 --- as near as I > > >> can tell without testing

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-04 Thread Sean Chittenden
> >> Or at least it's *trying* to apply it for 4.7 --- as near as I > >> can tell without testing, the above scrap of resultmap code is > >> wrong because both of the i.86 lines will match on FreeBSD 4.7, > >> and I think the pg_regress coding will take the last match. > >> Larry, did you actually

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-04 Thread Bruce Momjian
Ports list updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Alessio Bragadini wrote: > On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 10:22:42AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > > I've committed fixes for the oth

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-04 Thread Alessio Bragadini
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 10:22:42AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > I've committed fixes for the other issues too, so CVS tip should now > pass cleanly on your platform. I've built the snapshot from CVS tip and now the regression tests pass with both GCC 2.95.1 and Compaq C V6.4-216 (dtk) on Digital UNI

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-01 Thread Tom Lane
Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 09:53, Tom Lane wrote: >> Or at least it's *trying* to apply it for 4.7 --- as near as I can tell >> without testing, the above scrap of resultmap code is wrong because both >> of the i.86 lines will match on FreeBSD 4.7, and I thin

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-01 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 09:53, Tom Lane wrote: > Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > $ uname -a > > FreeBSD avienda.nxad.com 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #1: Mon Oct 28 18:20:14 >PST 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DELLAPTOP i386 > > > Looks like the only problem on

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-01 Thread Tom Lane
Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > $ uname -a > FreeBSD avienda.nxad.com 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #1: Mon Oct 28 18:20:14 PST >2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DELLAPTOP i386 > Looks like the only problem on beta3 is that the geometry bits are > failing, but I'm

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-01 Thread Tom Lane
I said: > The alter_table diff is clearly indicative of a bug. Can you set a > breakpoint and discover exactly where calloc is blowing up? Never mind, I see it: psql is doing calloc(0) when presented with a table of zero columns. Surprising you're the first to try it on a platform where that ret

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-01 Thread Tom Lane
Alessio Bragadini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 18:53, Tom Lane wrote: >> Evidently main.c needs "#include " added. > I wonder what have changed since Beta2 that compiled fine... That is odd. main.c itself certainly has not changed. > Done, and now it builds (I've limited

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-01 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 01:57, Sean Chittenden wrote: > > > >>Seems like someone ought to issue a call for port reports. The > > > >>"supported platforms" list hasn't been touched ... > > > > Good point. Thomas, can you take that on? > > > > > > No, at least not now. I'm not able to communicate re

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-11-01 Thread Alessio Bragadini
On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 18:53, Tom Lane wrote: > Evidently main.c needs "#include " added. I wonder what have changed since Beta2 that compiled fine... > Please add that and see if you get any further. Done, and now it builds (I've limited the test to native cc compiler for now). But it doesn't

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-31 Thread Sean Chittenden
> > >>Seems like someone ought to issue a call for port reports. The > > >>"supported platforms" list hasn't been touched ... > > > Good point. Thomas, can you take that on? > > > > No, at least not now. I'm not able to communicate reliably with the > > mailing lists, and so can not coordinate

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-31 Thread Tom Lane
Alessio Bragadini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version >> number please. > DOESN'T WORK on Digital Unix/Tru64 4.0g, with both cc or gcc compiler. Evidently main.c needs "#include " added. Please add that and see if you get any further.

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-31 Thread Alessio Bragadini
> Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version > number please. DOESN'T WORK on Digital Unix/Tru64 4.0g, with both cc or gcc compiler. Using Compaq C V6.4-216 (dtk) on Digital UNIX V4.0G (Rev. 1530) Compiler Driver V6.4-013 (dtk) cc Driver: make[3]: Entering directory `/usr

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-30 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have reviewed your diff and found that it was either timezone changes or join.sql which I have recently fixed. Can you grab current CVS snapshot and try again? --- Ian Barwick wrote: > On Tuesday 29 October 2002 01:56, Br

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-30 Thread Adam Witney
On 29/10/02 1:50 pm, "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Strange. I just got report from another OSX 10.2.1 user saying >> regression tests passed: >> 10.2.1, Adam Witney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> The proper value seems to be: >> 15.3864610140472 >>

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-30 Thread Tara Piorkowski
Bruce, Not sure. I know Tom Lane ran a check on 10.1.x and didn't have any errors, so I figured the differences I saw reflected changes made by Apple between 10.1.x and 10.2.x. Then, I was surprised when I saw Adam's report, so I thought perhaps he was running on a PPC G3 and there were differ

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Ian Barwick
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 01:56, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Sorry, Ian, here is the patch I applied. You can apply this to whatever > version you are using and test Irix with that, rather than having to > grab CVS. OK, I have carried out make check with the updated tests but got FAILED on the same f

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Jason Tishler
Dave, On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:00:20PM -, Dave Page wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@;tishler.net] > > Sent: 29 October 2002 18:58 > > > > > Hackers: As the Cygwin release that is actively supported is the > > > binary distribution that Jason buil

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@;candle.pha.pa.us] > Sent: 29 October 2002 19:34 > To: Dave Page > Cc: PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms > > > > Attach

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@;tishler.net] > Sent: 29 October 2002 18:58 > To: Dave Page > Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; > Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms &

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
; > Cc: PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane > > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms > > > > > > > > I have updated CVS and re-added getopt.c, now in /port, and > > updated win32.mak. That should help. > > Thanks. Unfortuna

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
gt; From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@;tishler.net] > > Sent: 29 October 2002 14:48 > > To: Dave Page > > Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; > > Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin > > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms > > &g

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Jason Tishler
Dave, On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 04:57:58PM -, Dave Page wrote: > All regression tests pass with the above hack on: > > CYGWIN_NT-5.1 PC9 1.3.14(0.62/3/2) 2002-10-24 10:48 i686 unknown Thanks for the above. > Hackers: As the Cygwin release that is actively supported is the > binary distributio

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Robert Treat
On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 12:16, Magnus Naeslund(f) wrote: > Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I noticed that the supported platforms listed 7.2 for linux alpha but > > with yesterdays date. I figured it was just a typo, but thought I > > would try to compile myself just to be sure, but I rec

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Magnus Naeslund(f)
Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I noticed that the supported platforms listed 7.2 for linux alpha but > with yesterdays date. I figured it was just a typo, but thought I > would try to compile myself just to be sure, but I received 4 > failures: horology,geometry,opr_sanity, and misc > >

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@;tishler.net] > Sent: 29 October 2002 14:48 > To: Dave Page > Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; > Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platfo

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Robert Treat
I noticed that the supported platforms listed 7.2 for linux alpha but with yesterdays date. I figured it was just a typo, but thought I would try to compile myself just to be sure, but I received 4 failures: horology,geometry,opr_sanity, and misc This is on alpha running debian 3 linux uname -a

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Jason Tishler
Matthew, On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 10:50:40PM -0500, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: > Are you compiling from CVS or from a released tarball? CVS. > The bison requirement was recently raised to bison 1.5 or above (1.75 > was recently released also.) This is an issue only when compiling > from CVS, sin

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Jason Tishler
Dave, On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 08:58:12PM -, Dave Page wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@;tishler.net] > > Sent: 28 October 2002 20:42 > > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms > > > > On Mon, Oct

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Strange. I just got report from another OSX 10.2.1 user saying > regression tests passed: >10.2.1, Adam Witney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The proper value seems to be: > 15.3864610140472 > or > 15.3864610140473 > in ./expected/geometry-po

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-29 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@;candle.pha.pa.us] > Sent: 29 October 2002 04:24 > To: Dave Page > Cc: PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms > > > > I have upd

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have updated CVS and re-added getopt.c, now in /port, and updated win32.mak. That should help. --- Dave Page wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@;candle.pha.pa.us] > > Sent:

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Matthew T. O'Connor
Are you compiling from CVS or from a released tarball? The bison requirement was recently raised to bison 1.5 or above (1.75 was recently released also.) This is an issue only when compiling from CVS, since the bison stuff is preprocessed for released tarballs. So you might want to try the just

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
Ports list updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Magnus Naeslund(f) wrote: > Linux alpha. > > An Redhat 6.2, "Linux gsX 2.4.19-pre6 #4 Thu Apr 11 07:17:39 CEST 2002 > alpha

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Magnus Naeslund(f)
Linux alpha. An Redhat 6.2, "Linux gsX 2.4.19-pre6 #4 Thu Apr 11 07:17:39 CEST 2002 alpha unknown" (ev56 ruffian). gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release) ./configure \ --prefix=/usr/local/pgsql-7.3b3 \ --with-maxbackends=512 \ --with-tcl \ --without-tk

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
Strange. I just got report from another OSX 10.2.1 user saying regression tests passed: 10.2.1, Adam Witney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]> The proper value seems to be: 15.3864610140472 or 15.3864610140473 in ./expected/geometry-powerpc-darwin.out. Which is it, folks? -

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
Ports list updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 05:32:04PM -0500, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > > Solaris 7, 2xUltraSPARC-II 400

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
Ports list updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 10:17:22PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > OK, Tom will be away next week,

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
Sorry, Ian, here is the patch I applied. You can apply this to whatever version you are using and test Irix with that, rather than having to grab CVS. --- Neil Conway wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > P

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 05:32:04PM -0500, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > Solaris 7, 2xUltraSPARC-II 400 MHz, 2.5 Gig, gcc 2.95.3; all tests > pass. Solaris 8 forthcoming. I should have mentioned that this is for beta 3; I don't have the necessary bison installed to compile from CVS. Solaris 8, 2xUltra

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Ian Barwick
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 00:08, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Neil Conway wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Ports list updated: > > > > Shouldn't the "join" regression test failure be fixed? > > OK, I have updated the join regression test to add ORDER BY in the > queries Irix di

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
Neil Conway wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Ports list updated: > > Shouldn't the "join" regression test failure be fixed? OK, I have updated the join regression test to add ORDER BY in the queries Irix differed. Ian, would you retest the CVS version of PostgreSQL to see i

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 10:17:22PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > OK, Tom will be away next week, and Thomas will too. I can do it. > Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version > number please. Solaris 7, 2xUltraSPARC-II 400 MHz, 2.5 Gig, gcc 2.95.3; all tests pass. Solari

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 14:58, Dave Page wrote: > > > > > > > My WAG is that you will be able to upgrade your Cygwin installation > > > before I fix the Cygwin build issues. :,) > > > > I guess my WAG was wrong... :,) > > I've been meaning to ask this for a while - what exactly is a WAG? :-) Wild

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@;tishler.net] > Sent: 28 October 2002 20:42 > To: Dave Page > Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; > Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms >

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Jason Tishler
Dave, On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:20:16AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:56:01PM -, Dave Page wrote: > > Ok, but this is going to take a while as few of the mirrors seem to > > have this release yet. I also need to download a new set of everything > > for reasons I won

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Tom Lane
"Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Horology failures are normal for a day or so on either side >> of a DST change --- see the "regression tests interpretation" >> docs. I have no time right now to examine the other diffs. > The docs say: > Some of the queries in the timestamp test will

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 10:20, Jason Tishler wrote: > > > 2. Cygwin bison limit exceeded: > > > > > > make[4]: Entering directory > > > `/home/jt/src/pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc' > > > [snip] > > > bison -y -d preproc.y > > > preproc.y:5560: fatal error: maximum table size (32767) exceeded

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Jason Tishler
Dave, On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:56:01PM -, Dave Page wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@;tishler.net] > > Sent: 28 October 2002 13:33 > > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms > > > > Please try

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@;sss.pgh.pa.us] > Sent: 28 October 2002 15:53 > To: Jason Tishler > Cc: Dave Page; Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas > Lockhart; Pgsql-Cygwin > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platf

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Tom Lane
>> Make installcheck also failed on horology, copy2 and domain - see >> attached output. >> >> The clocks changed here on Saturday night, so I guess that shouldn't >> have caused the first error (or should the docs be updated?). Horology failures are normal for a day or so on either side of a DS

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@;tishler.net] > Sent: 28 October 2002 13:33 > To: Dave Page > Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; > Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms >

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
I thought the join was part of the timezone change, but I see now that it is separate. I will fix it by adding ORDER BY. --- Neil Conway wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Ports list updated: > > Should

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Jason Tishler
Dave, Thanks for the heads up... On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 10:31:00AM -, Dave Page wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@;candle.pha.pa.us] > > Sent: 26 October 2002 03:17 > > Subject: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms > > > > Folks. start sending

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Tara Piorkowski
Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian writes: >Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version >number please. I've checked CVS tip on: HPUX 10.20, using both gcc and vendor's cc PPC Linux Mac OS X 10.1 Here's the regression.diffs file from Mac OS X 10.2.1 (Jaguar). It faile

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@;candle.pha.pa.us] > Sent: 26 October 2002 03:17 > To: PostgreSQL-development > Cc: Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane > Subject: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms > > > Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-28 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@;candle.pha.pa.us] > Sent: 26 October 2002 03:17 > To: PostgreSQL-development > Cc: Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane > Subject: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms > > > Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and >

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-27 Thread Magnus Naeslund(f)
On an rh6.2, "Linux gsX 2.4.19-pre6 #4 Thu Apr 11 07:17:39 CEST 2002 alpha unknown" (ev56 ruffian) i get this failure. Should ./configure && gmake && gmake check be the only things i need to do? == creating database "regression" == /home/mag/d/postgresql/postgresq

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-27 Thread Neil Conway
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ports list updated: Shouldn't the "join" regression test failure be fixed? Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
Ports list updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Ian Barwick wrote: > On Saturday 26 October 2002 04:17, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > OK, Tom will be away next week, and

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-27 Thread Ian Barwick
On Saturday 26 October 2002 04:17, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > OK, Tom will be away next week, and Thomas will too. I can do it. > Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version > number please. > > The current platform list is: > > http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postg

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
Ports list updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 04:01:17PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > Updated: > > > > http://c

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-26 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 04:01:17PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Updated: > > http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html Linux 2.4 on IA32 passes also. -- Alvaro Herrera () "La felicidad no es maƱana. La felicidad es ahora" ---(end of

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
Updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Doug McNaught wrote: > Doug McNaught <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > OK, compile went fine, but I get multiple regression test failu

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
Updated: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html --- Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version >

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-26 Thread Doug McNaught
Doug McNaught <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > OK, compile went fine, but I get multiple regression test failures: > > test geometry ... FAILED After realizing that my disk had filled up (thanks Alvaro) I reran the tests and 'geometry' is the only failure. I'm guessing this is due to f

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-26 Thread Stephan Szabo
On 26 Oct 2002, Doug McNaught wrote: > Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Doug McNaught <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > make[3]: Entering directory >`/home/doug/src/pgsql/src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/ascii_and_mic' > > > gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declaration

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-26 Thread Doug McNaught
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Doug McNaught <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > make[3]: Entering directory >`/home/doug/src/pgsql/src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/ascii_and_mic' > > gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -fpic > > -I../../../../../../src/include -c

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-26 Thread Tom Lane
Doug McNaught <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > make[3]: Entering directory >`/home/doug/src/pgsql/src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/ascii_and_mic' > gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -fpic > -I../../../../../../src/include -c -o ascii_and_mic.o > ascii_and_mic.c > ascii_

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-26 Thread Doug McNaught
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version > > number please. > > I've checked CVS tip on: > HPUX 10.20, using both gcc and vendor's cc > PPC Linux > Mac OS X 10.1 I get

Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

2002-10-26 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version > number please. I've checked CVS tip on: HPUX 10.20, using both gcc and vendor's cc PPC Linux Mac OS X 10.1 regards, tom lane --