Stephen Frost writes:
> * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>> One thought is that the column cases should be phrased more like
>> no privileges could be revoked for column "foo" of table "bar"
> Looks like 'for column "foo" of relation "bar"' is more typical, so
> that's what I did in the att
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> One thought is that the column cases should be phrased more like
> no privileges could be revoked for column "foo" of table "bar"
> Check the messages associated with DROP cascading for the canonical
> phrasing here, but I think that's what it is.
Loo
Stephen Frost writes:
> * Joshua D. Drake (j...@commandprompt.com) wrote:
>> Perhaps just add what can't be revoked? meaning:
>> WARNING: no privileges could be revoked for "tbl" for column "foo"
>> Then they aren't actually duplicate.
> Yeah, they really aren't, after all.
Yeah, I agree JD's s
All,
* Joshua D. Drake (j...@commandprompt.com) wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 11:23 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I'm not sure offhand about a reasonable way to rearrange the code to
> > avoid duplicate messages.
>
> Perhaps just add what can't be revoked? meaning:
> WARNING: no privileges could b
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 11:23 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Piyush Newe writes:
> >> create table tbl(col int);
> >> create user usr;
> >> grant select on tbl to usr;
> >> \c postgres usr;
> >> REVOKE SELECT on tbl from usr;
> >> WARNING: no privileges could be revoked for "tbl"
> >> WARNIN
I wrote:
> Piyush Newe writes:
>> create table tbl(col int);
>> create user usr;
>> grant select on tbl to usr;
>> \c postgres usr;
>> REVOKE SELECT on tbl from usr;
>> WARNING: no privileges could be revoked for "tbl"
>> WARNING: no privileges could be revoked for "tbl"
>> WARNING: no privileg
Piyush Newe writes:
> create table tbl(col int);
> create user usr;
> grant select on tbl to usr;
> \c postgres usr;
> REVOKE SELECT on tbl from usr;
> WARNING: no privileges could be revoked for "tbl"
> WARNING: no privileges could be revoked for "tbl"
> WARNING: no privileges could be revoked
