On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The INSTALL file looks quite bad.
It's clearly been freshly generated. The formatting does seem worse
than in previous versions, but it's not so bad I'd want to hold up
the release to fix it.
My guess is that the "wr
I wrote:
> My guess is that the "wrong" version of lynx is being used to build it.
> I remember being dissatisfied with the output of developer.pg.org's
> version of lynx back when we were making this file manually.
> (The version I have here is 2.8.5rel.1 (04 Feb 2004) and it seems to
> do fine.)
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The INSTALL file looks quite bad.
It's clearly been freshly generated. The formatting does seem worse
than in previous versions, but it's not so bad I'd want to hold up
the release to fix it.
My guess is that the "wrong" version of lynx is being use
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jun 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >> Anyone else, please test the tar ball for any bug/nits ...
> >> specifically, Peter, can you check that I've built/included the
> >> right documentation?
> >
> > Try reading the list of supported
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Anyone else, please test the tar ball for any bug/nits ...
specifically, Peter, can you check that I've built/included the right
documentation?
Try reading the list of supported platforms at the bottom of the INSTALL
file...
k, an
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Removing README.CVS from the tarball is something Marc handles, as
>> far as I know. I just added it to CVS and never worked on having it
>> removed from the tarballs.
> I've added a rule to remove README.CVS when making a dist
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Anyone else, please test the tar ball for any bug/nits ...
> specifically, Peter, can you check that I've built/included the right
> documentation?
Try reading the list of supported platforms at the bottom of the INSTALL
file...
---(end of broad
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Removing README.CVS from the tarball is something Marc handles, as
> far as I know. I just added it to CVS and never worked on having it
> removed from the tarballs.
I've added a rule to remove README.CVS when making a distribution. But
I seem to be missing any rules to bu
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Anyone else, please test the tar ball for any bug/nits ...
>
> README.CVS is not supposed to appear in the tarball --- whatever Bruce
> thought he did to remove it is not working ...
Removing README.CVS from the tarball is somet
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyone else, please test the tar ball for any bug/nits ...
README.CVS is not supposed to appear in the tarball --- whatever Bruce
thought he did to remove it is not working ...
regards, tom lane
---(
10 matches
Mail list logo