Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests for OBSD scrammed..

2001-05-10 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was doing serial. Try the parallels a few times, and you *will* see it fail. Reason: Stephan added a bunch of tests to alter_table.sql that create/modify/delete tables named pktable and fktable. Unfortunately, foreign_key.sql uses those same names f

Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests for OBSD scrammed..

2001-05-10 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was doing serial. And ... ? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests for OBSD scrammed..

2001-05-10 Thread Tom Lane
Hmm ... Bruce, were you doing serial or parallel regress tests? I'm finding that the serial tests work and the parallels blow up. It might be that this is because of my anti-lseek hacking, but I kinda doubt it because the failures occur right about where bpalmer saw trouble with last night's CVS .

Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests for OBSD scrammed..

2001-05-10 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I will bump it now. I didn't see anything either, but initdb fixed my > regression test errors. That was probably a waste of effort. I just finished pulling down and recompiling CVS tip. I see no regression failures, either using a data directory lef

Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests for OBSD scrammed..

2001-05-10 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > OK, do an initdb and watch the errors disapper. :-) Did someone forget to bump catversion.h? I didn't notice any recent commits that sounded like they'd need to force an initdb, but maybe I missed something. regards, tom lane