Hi Ioannis,
> Also i'd like to answer you if postgresQL has implemented rcursive
> queries
> proposed from SQL99 standard?
>
Not yet. But there is a patch around that implement it. See
http://gppl.moonbone.ru/
> If yes, are there any restrictions of the model on your
> implementation?
>
The pat
ok, i'll fix some nasty bugs, and post it here for review.
regards,
evgen
-Original Message-
>
>On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 07:23:45PM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>> I'm a PostgreSQL developer and I would like to see an SQL99 recursive
>> queries feature in PostgreSQL.
>
>Me too,
* jacob koehler (RRes-Roth) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-27 20:58]:
>
> cons:
> - its not standard SQL (uses oracle style syntax)
Besides the GPL issue, this is my biggest problem.
> i am aware of the fact that tom lane pointed to the fact that Andrew
> Overholt did work towards SQL99 compliant
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 07:23:45PM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> I'm a PostgreSQL developer and I would like to see an SQL99 recursive
> queries feature in PostgreSQL.
Me too, on bot parts.
> I'm not a committer myself, so I think I should explain how things work.
> We're unlike othe
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Overholt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 28 June 2004 16:45
> To: jacob koehler (RRes-Roth)
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Alexander Rüegg
> Subject: Re: recursive SQL
>
>
> * jacob koehler (RRes-Roth) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [2004-06-2
On T, 2004-06-29 at 13:11, jacob koehler (RRes-Roth) wrote:
> seems evgen has got a sql99 compliant version of recursive SQL
> out and would agree to relicense it.
> are there any other concerns regarding evgens work? or do you want to
> encourage him to go this route? i have the impression he wo
Hi Evgen,
I'm a PostgreSQL developer and I would like to see an SQL99 recursive
queries feature in PostgreSQL.
I'm pretty sure that Tom would be happy with an SQL99 compliant version
of your patch, so long as it's up to scratch with the normal PostgreSQL
coding and reliability standards.
I'm n
would be very useful to have your patch as part of the
> >official release...
> >
> >regards,
> >jacob
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: 26 June 2004 20:42
> >&g
"jacob koehler (RRes-Roth)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It would first have to be relicensed ...
> it would be interesting to know if it would be included, IFF the author
> publishes it under BSD.
This patch has been proposed and rejected before. It doesn't do the
SQL-standard syntax for recu
- Evgen DID publish this patch under GPL, see:
http://gppl.terminal.ru/README.html
We cannot use GPL code in PostgreSQL. PostgreSQL is BSD licensed. As
to why on earth he GPL'd - I have no idea...
Chris
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe an
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 26 June 2004 20:42
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] recursive SQL
>
>
>
>
> jacob koehler (RRes-Roth) wrote:
>
> >hi,
> >
> >i am wonder
jacob koehler (RRes-Roth) wrote:
hi,
i am wondering what you think about including evgen potemkin's patch for recursive SQL
in the next postgres version:
http://gppl.terminal.ru/
[snip]
- Evgen DID publish this patch under GPL, see:
http://gppl.terminal.ru/README.html
It would first have to b
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was wondering whether, as a future project, we could make this more
> convenient by parsing the body of the function with the binding of the
> function already in effect.
Seems like a simple rearrangement of the code. First insert the pg_proc
entr
13 matches
Mail list logo
