Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_upgrade fails: Mismatch of relation OID in database 8.4 -> 9.3

2014-05-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 06:28:28AM -0700, David G Johnston wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote > > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:20:38AM -0600, Jeff Ross wrote: > >> >I just tested ALTER TABLE in 8.4 and it does create a toast table for > >> >this case in 9.4: > >> > > >> > CREATE TABLE test (x CHAR(10)); >

Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_upgrade

2001-03-22 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane writes: > Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > If it doesn't work, and will not be made to work, then let's remove it > > from the tree. > > I tend to agree with Peter's slightly less drastic proposal: remove it > >from the installed fileset and disable its man page, without n

Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_upgrade

2001-03-19 Thread Bruce Momjian
Whatever you guys decide is fine with me. > Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > If it doesn't work, and will not be made to work, then let's remove it > > from the tree. > > I tend to agree with Peter's slightly less drastic proposal: remove it > from the installed fileset and disabl

Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_upgrade

2001-03-18 Thread Tom Lane
Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If it doesn't work, and will not be made to work, then let's remove it > from the tree. I tend to agree with Peter's slightly less drastic proposal: remove it from the installed fileset and disable its man page, without necessarily 'cvs remove'ing all