Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Text search parser's treatment of URLs and emails

2010-10-12 Thread Sushant Sinha
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 19:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > This seems much of a piece with the existing proposal to allow > individual "words" of a URL to be reported separately: > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=378 > > As I said in that thread, this could be done in a backwards

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Text search parser's treatment of URLs and emails

2010-10-12 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian writes: > [ sent to hackers where it belongs ] > Thom Brown wrote: >> It could be me being picky, but I don't regard parameters or page >> fragments as part of the URL path. > Wow, that is a tough one. One the one hand, it seems nice to be able to > split stuff out more, but on the