On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Karel, where did things stand the last time this was brought up? We
> > haven't gone beta yet, can you re-submit a patch for v7.1 before beta so
> > that we can integrate the changes?
>
> I think it would be
The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Karel, where did things stand the last time this was brought up? We
> haven't gone beta yet, can you re-submit a patch for v7.1 before beta so
> that we can integrate the changes?
I think it would be a very bad idea to try to integrate the query ca
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Karel Zak wrote:
>
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> > > Karel Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Implemented stored proceedures for
> > > postgresql but still hasn't been approached to integrated them.
> >
> > some
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > Karel Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Implemented stored proceedures for
> > postgresql but still hasn't been approached to integrated them.
>
> someone has to approach him to integrate them? *raised eyebr
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Steve Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001031 13:47] wrote:
> >
> > > >(Incidentally, we've toyed around with developping a
> > query-caching
> > > > system that would sit betwen PostgreSQL and our DB libraries.
> > >
> > > Sounds amazing, but
