Re: [HACKERS] Per-table log_autovacuum_min_duration is actually documented

2015-11-11 Thread Michael Paquier
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Paquier writes: >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Alvaro Herrera >> wrote: >>> I think you're remembering this: >>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150402205713.gb22...@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org > >> Right. Thanks. Do you think we'd

Re: [HACKERS] Per-table log_autovacuum_min_duration is actually documented

2015-11-11 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Paquier writes: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Alvaro Herrera > wrote: >> I think you're remembering this: >> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150402205713.gb22...@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org > Right. Thanks. Do you think we'd still want a patch to improve that? Give it a try if you

Re: [HACKERS] Per-table log_autovacuum_min_duration is actually documented

2015-11-11 Thread Michael Paquier
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Michael Paquier wrote: > >> I recall that we had some talks about grouping all the relopts into a >> single documentation section, perhaps not having one is at the origin >> of the confusion? > > I think you're remembering this: > http://www

Re: [HACKERS] Per-table log_autovacuum_min_duration is actually documented

2015-11-11 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Michael Paquier wrote: > I recall that we had some talks about grouping all the relopts into a > single documentation section, perhaps not having one is at the origin > of the confusion? I think you're remembering this: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150402205713.gb22...@eldon.alvh.no-ip.

Re: [HACKERS] Per-table log_autovacuum_min_duration is actually documented

2015-11-11 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Paquier writes: > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:07 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Should it read "Overrides log_autovacuum_min_duration for autovacuum > >> operations on this specific table or toast table"? > > > The same applied for all the other autovacuum and autoanalyze >

Re: [HACKERS] Per-table log_autovacuum_min_duration is actually documented

2015-11-11 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Paquier writes: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:07 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Should it read "Overrides log_autovacuum_min_duration for autovacuum >> operations on this specific table or toast table"? > The same applied for all the other autovacuum and autoanalyze > parameters. Do you think tha

Re: [HACKERS] Per-table log_autovacuum_min_duration is actually documented

2015-11-10 Thread Michael Paquier
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:07 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Paquier writes: >> This is actually documented in src/sgml/ref/create_table.sgml with the >> following paragraph so this mention in the release notes does not seem >> needed: >> log_autovacuum_min_duration, toast.log_autovacuum_min_durat

Re: [HACKERS] Per-table log_autovacuum_min_duration is actually documented

2015-11-10 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Paquier writes: > While going through the release notes of 9.5 I noticed the following > chunk in doc/src/sgml/release-9.5.sgml: > Add per-table autovacuum logging control via > log_min_autovacuum_duration (Michael Paquier) > NOT DOCUMENTED? Yeah ... I was going to do something about that