Joe Conway wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
[ Joe, would you review this? ]
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
The pa
Bruce Momjian wrote:
[ Joe, would you review this? ]
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
The patch itself is pret
[ Joe, would you review this? ]
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jonathan Beit-Aharon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > if (!conn)
> >
> > DBLINK_CONN_NOT_AVAIL;
>
> Could we see this in a less broken format?
Here is the patch in text format.
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman
Jonathan Beit-Aharon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> if (!conn)
>
> DBLINK_CONN_NOT_AVAIL;
> +
> + if (rcon)
> +
> rcon->remoteTrFlag = (PQtransactionStatus(conn) !=
> PQTRANS_IDLE);
>
> - res = PQexec(conn, "BEGIN");
> - if (PQresultStatus(r
