Re: [HACKERS] PGDN source browser

2005-06-06 Thread Tino Wildenhain
Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 22:59 +0200 schrieb Gevik babakhani: > Dear all, > > > > The PostgreSQL Developer Networkʼs Source Browser (beta1) is ready. > > If you got the time to check it for a moment, please do not hesitate > to send your opinion. Hm. wouldn't an install of trac/postgres

Re: [HACKERS] PGDN source browser

2005-06-06 Thread Jonah H. Harris
PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 4:50 PM To: Tom Flavel Cc: Gevik babakhani; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PGDN source browser Gevik, You still didn't answer my question as to why you're reinventing the wheel. Why not just work on updating techdo

Re: [HACKERS] PGDN source browser

2005-06-06 Thread Gevik babakhani
, 2005 4:50 PM To: Tom Flavel Cc: Gevik babakhani; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PGDN source browser Gevik, You still didn't answer my question as to why you're reinventing the wheel. Why not just work on updating techdocs instead? -Jonah Tom Flavel wrote: >

Re: [HACKERS] PGDN source browser

2005-06-06 Thread Jonah H. Harris
Gevik, You still didn't answer my question as to why you're reinventing the wheel. Why not just work on updating techdocs instead? -Jonah Tom Flavel wrote: On 04/06/2005 22:59:19, Gevik babakhani wrote: Dear all, The PostgreSQL Developer Network's Source Browser (beta1) is ready. I

Re: [HACKERS] PGDN source browser

2005-06-05 Thread Havasvölgyi Ottó
Gevik,   I like your idea. I have already checked it out. Its treeview is really like MSDN's. Some comments, ideas:  - it would be better if the treeview was ordered by name  - the current item in the treeview could be highlighted  - the gutter should have a constant width  - it would be ple

Re: [HACKERS] PGDN source browser

2005-06-05 Thread Tom Flavel
On 04/06/2005 22:59:19, Gevik babakhani wrote: > Dear all, > > The PostgreSQL Developer Network's Source Browser (beta1) is ready. > > If you got the time to check it for a moment, please do not hesitate to send Firstly, good that you're asking for comments (I assume as an attempt to work with