Re: [HACKERS] Operator family docs

2007-01-10 Thread Dave Page
Tom Lane wrote: Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/catalog-pg-opfamily.html states that "Operator families are described at length in Section 33.14." which does not seem to be the case. Did it get missed in a commit? No, I haven't got round to

Re: [HACKERS] Operator family docs

2007-01-10 Thread Tom Lane
Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/catalog-pg-opfamily.html > states that > "Operator families are described at length in Section 33.14." > which does not seem to be the case. Did it get missed in a commit? No, I haven't got round to updating xi