Re: [HACKERS] Old binary packages.

2004-01-20 Thread Lamar Owen
On Tuesday 20 January 2004 01:36 pm, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > But where are the spec files and other stuff that belongs into the old > RPMs? Just the source releases are not enough if someone needs to deal > with old systems. And since you mentioned it, creating a source > tarball from CVS does

Re: [HACKERS] Old binary packages.

2004-01-20 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Lamar Owen wrote: > While disk may be cheap, it ain't so cheap that wasting it is a good > thing. With the source releases still available way back, havng > binaries that old, while useful to some, is not IMO in the best > interest of all. But where are the spec files and other stuff that belongs

Re: [HACKERS] Old binary packages.

2004-01-20 Thread V i s h a l Kashyap @ [Sai Hertz And Control Systems]
Dear Lamar Owen , Since we are keeping all source releases (although I would question that, since we use CVS), keeping all the binaries around is just a space waster, IMHO. Comments? Keeping 7.X and then 7.X.y where y is the last minor version for 7.X is fine As you would have noticed from

Re: [HACKERS] Old binary packages.

2004-01-20 Thread Lamar Owen
On Monday 19 January 2004 03:53 pm, Tom Lane wrote: > Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I am looking at the possibility of cleaning up the binary tree on the ftp > > site, and was wondering what the group thought about purging old > > binaries. What I was thinking would be to remove all bu

Re: [HACKERS] Old binary packages.

2004-01-20 Thread Richard Huxton
On Monday 19 January 2004 19:35, Lamar Owen wrote: > What I was thinking would be to remove all but the last minor release of > each major version. Thus, I would remove 7.4, but leave 7.4.1. Perhaps check the download figures for each first? -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd -

Re: [HACKERS] Old binary packages.

2004-01-20 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 20 January 2004 00:21 > To: Lamar Owen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Old binary packages. > > Lamar Owen wrote: > > I am looking at the possibility of cleaning u

Re: [HACKERS] Old binary packages.

2004-01-19 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Lamar Owen wrote: > I am looking at the possibility of cleaning up the binary tree on the > ftp site, and was wondering what the group thought about purging old > binaries. What I was thinking would be to remove all but the last > minor release of each major version. Thus, I would remove 7.4, but

Re: [HACKERS] Old binary packages.

2004-01-19 Thread Tom Lane
Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am looking at the possibility of cleaning up the binary tree on the ftp > site, and was wondering what the group thought about purging old binaries. > What I was thinking would be to remove all but the last minor release of each > major version. Thus,

Re: [HACKERS] Old binary packages.

2004-01-19 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Lamar Owen wrote: I am looking at the possibility of cleaning up the binary tree on the ftp site, and was wondering what the group thought about purging old binaries. What I was thinking would be to remove all but the last minor release of each major version. Thus, I would remove 7.4, but lea