On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 12:51:47AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=cuckoo&dt=2005-11-15%2023:56:22
>
> I took a closer look at this, and noticed something interesting:
>
> ccache gcc -no-cpp-precomp -O2 -fno-str
"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=cuckoo&dt=2005-11-15%2023:56:22
I took a closer look at this, and noticed something interesting:
ccache gcc -no-cpp-precomp -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -b
"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:13]~/buildfarm/source:39%otool -L `which perl`
> /opt/local/bin/perl:
> /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current
> version 71.1.3)
These aren't particularly relevant: you need to look at the shared
libr
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 11:50:51AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I do have perl, python, tcl and nls enabled, could one of them
> > be trying to pull libssl and libcrypto in for some reason?
>
> Perhaps --- try "otool -L" (local equivalent of ldd) on them
"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I do have perl, python, tcl and nls enabled, could one of them
> be trying to pull libssl and libcrypto in for some reason?
Perhaps --- try "otool -L" (local equivalent of ldd) on them to find
out.
regards, tom lane
---
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 10:27:06PM -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 11:04:59PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > So the recent thread about getting 7.4 compiling on OS X inspired me.
> > > But what I can't understand is that I've yanked
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
So the recent thread about getting 7.4 compiling on OS X inspired me.
But what I can't understand is that I've yanked --with-ssl, but it's
still looking for l
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> "Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> So the recent thread about getting 7.4 compiling on OS X inspired me.
>>> But what I can't understand is that I've yanked --with-ssl, but it's
>>> still looking for libssl:
>> Tad hard to
Tom Lane wrote:
"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
So the recent thread about getting 7.4 compiling on OS X inspired me.
But what I can't understand is that I've yanked --with-ssl, but it's
still looking for libssl:
Tad hard to believe. Maybe you missed a "make distclean" o
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 11:04:59PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > So the recent thread about getting 7.4 compiling on OS X inspired me.
> > But what I can't understand is that I've yanked --with-ssl, but it's
> > still looking for libssl:
>
> Tad hard to be
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 11:04:59PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > So the recent thread about getting 7.4 compiling on OS X inspired me.
> > But what I can't understand is that I've yanked --with-ssl, but it's
> > still looking for libssl:
>
> Tad hard to be
"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So the recent thread about getting 7.4 compiling on OS X inspired me.
> But what I can't understand is that I've yanked --with-ssl, but it's
> still looking for libssl:
Tad hard to believe. Maybe you missed a "make distclean" or so?
(BTW, the flag is -
12 matches
Mail list logo
