Re: [HACKERS] Notice and share memory corruption

2000-09-18 Thread Tom Lane
Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Define your terms more carefully, please. What do you mean by >> "unable to vacuum" --- what happens *exactly*? > NOTICE: FlushRelationBuffers(access_right, 2009): block 1944 is > referenced (private 0, global 2) > FATAL 1: VACUUM (vc_repair_frag):

Re: [HACKERS] Notice and share memory corruption

2000-09-18 Thread Hannu Krosing
Tom Lane wrote: > > Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I get the following on untuned Linux (Redhat 6.2) using stock 7.0.2 > > rpm-s > > > NOTICE: RegisterSharedInvalid: SI buffer overflow > > NOTICE: InvalidateSharedInvalid: cache state reset > > > Actually I get many of them ;( >

Re: [HACKERS] Notice and share memory corruption

2000-09-17 Thread Tom Lane
Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I get the following on untuned Linux (Redhat 6.2) using stock 7.0.2 > rpm-s > NOTICE: RegisterSharedInvalid: SI buffer overflow > NOTICE: InvalidateSharedInvalid: cache state reset > Actually I get many of them ;( AFAIK, these are just noise in 7.0.