RE: [HACKERS] New unified regression test driver

2000-10-05 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Frederick W. Reimer writes: > This may sound stupid, but what's wrong with including a binary make > executable in a binary PostgreSQL package? We don't need "make" for the regression test. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/peter-e/

RE: [HACKERS] New unified regression test driver

2000-10-05 Thread Frederick W. Reimer
ctober 05, 2000 1:43 PM > To: Lamar Owen > Cc: PostgreSQL Development > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New unified regression test driver > > > Lamar Owen writes: > > > That said, I have a request -- since the binary distributions might > > possibly be installed on machines w

Re: [HACKERS] New unified regression test driver

2000-10-05 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Lamar Owen writes: > That said, I have a request -- since the binary distributions might > possibly be installed on machines with no make and no compiler, I would > like to see the regression tests be reduced to a simple script and > driver that could be simply invoked with no need for make. Bin

Re: [HACKERS] New unified regression test driver

2000-09-29 Thread Lamar Owen
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > I've committed the announced unified regression test driver. (See Sep.20 > message for list of features.) You can invoke it via `make check', either > in the top level directory, or directly in src/test/regress. To test > against a running installation, use `make insta