Russell Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 05:40 pm, Michael Fuhr wrote:
>> I'd like to propose that we abandon the name "PostgreSQL" and rename the
>> project "Postgre", to be pronounced either "post-greh" or "post-gree".
> April 1 is nearly over.
Not on this side of the pond
Thomas Hallgren wrote:
Richard Huxton wrote:
Michael Fuhr wrote:
I'd like to propose that we abandon the name "PostgreSQL" and rename the
project "Postgre", to be pronounced either "post-greh" or "post-gree".
This change would have a twofold purpose: it would meet popular demand,
and it would refle
Richard Huxton wrote:
Michael Fuhr wrote:
I'd like to propose that we abandon the name "PostgreSQL" and rename the
project "Postgre", to be pronounced either "post-greh" or "post-gree".
This change would have a twofold purpose: it would meet popular demand,
and it would reflect my next proposal, th
Michael Fuhr wrote:
I'd like to propose that we abandon the name "PostgreSQL" and rename the
project "Postgre", to be pronounced either "post-greh" or "post-gree".
This change would have a twofold purpose: it would meet popular demand,
and it would reflect my next proposal, that we abandon SQL as t
> I'd like to propose that we abandon the name "PostgreSQL" and rename the
> project "Postgre", to be pronounced either "post-greh" or "post-gree".
> This change would have a twofold purpose: it would meet popular demand,
> and it would reflect my next proposal, that we abandon SQL as the query
> l
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 05:40 pm, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> I'd like to propose that we abandon the name "PostgreSQL" and rename the
> project "Postgre", to be pronounced either "post-greh" or "post-gree".
> This change would have a twofold purpose: it would meet popular demand,
> and it would reflect my ne
