On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Robert Haas writes:
Do you expect to do more work on the upper planner path-ification stuff
soon?
>
>>> Yeah, I do actually have some work in progress. Not
Robert Haas writes:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Robert Haas writes:
>>> Do you expect to do more work on the upper planner path-ification stuff
>>> soon?
>> Yeah, I do actually have some work in progress. Not sure how soon I'll be
>> ready to show it --- there's a lo
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> Do you expect to do more work on the upper planner path-ification stuff soon?
>
> Yeah, I do actually have some work in progress. Not sure how soon I'll be
> ready to show it --- there's a lot of code to break and reassemb
Robert Haas writes:
> Do you expect to do more work on the upper planner path-ification stuff soon?
Yeah, I do actually have some work in progress. Not sure how soon I'll be
ready to show it --- there's a lot of code to break and reassemble :-(
regards, tom lane
--
Se
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I've started to work on path-ification of the upper planner (finally),
> and since that's going to be a large patch in any case, I've been looking
> for pieces that could be bitten off and done separately. One such piece
> is the fact that SS_fina
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I've started to work on path-ification of the upper planner (finally),
I don't have any specific technical comments on what you've proposed
here, but I'm excited to hear that this is moving forward.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterp
David Rowley writes:
> On 10 August 2015 at 07:50, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I've started to work on path-ification of the upper planner (finally),
> I was digging around the grouping_planner() last week with the intentions
> of making some changes there to allow GROUP BY before join, but in the end
>
On 10 August 2015 at 07:50, Tom Lane wrote:
> I've started to work on path-ification of the upper planner (finally),
> and since that's going to be a large patch in any case, I've been looking
> for pieces that could be bitten off and done separately. One such piece
> is the fact that SS_finaliz
