Re: [HACKERS] Missing French backend translations in the HEAD

2004-08-11 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Tom Lane wrote: Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: en_BR would be cool, then I don't have to put up with all that American spelling :) I thought you'd be looking for en_OZ ... $ LANG=en_OZ initdb Stone the bloody crows, mate! Where's yer PGDATA? Don't come the raw pra

Re: [HACKERS] Missing French backend translations in the HEAD

2004-08-11 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Am Mittwoch, 11. August 2004 00:01 schrieb Serguei A. Mokhov: > So? It is still valid in most part for 8.0. The parts that are not, won't > do any bad. I think at the time I thought that a 7.5 version was going to be sent soon thereafter. Anyway, I've put the 7.4 file in the head branch now. >

Re: [HACKERS] Missing French backend translations in the HEAD

2004-08-11 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Am Mittwoch, 11. August 2004 04:34 schrieb Christopher Kings-Lynne: > en_BR would be cool, then I don't have to put up with all that American > spelling :) It would be en_GB (BR = Brazil), but by all means, feel free to do it. The "market" would certainly be large enough. -- Peter Eisentraut h

Re: [HACKERS] Missing French backend translations in the HEAD

2004-08-10 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Oh, just the pronunciation that's different then? Y're rite cobber, c'mon ofer here and check a prawin on tha barbie, mate! PS: just teasing of course Of course :) I could make fun of Americans, but where do you start? :) ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP

Re: [HACKERS] Missing French backend translations in the HEAD

2004-08-10 Thread Tom Lane
Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> en_BR would be cool, then I don't have to put up with all that American >>> spelling :) >> >> I thought you'd be looking for en_OZ ... > en_AU, but it's exactly the same as EN_BR, so that's fine :) Oh, just the pronunciation that's differe

Re: [HACKERS] Missing French backend translations in the HEAD

2004-08-10 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
en_BR would be cool, then I don't have to put up with all that American spelling :) I thought you'd be looking for en_OZ ... en_AU, but it's exactly the same as EN_BR, so that's fine :) Chris ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your f

Re: [HACKERS] Missing French backend translations in the HEAD

2004-08-10 Thread Tom Lane
Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > en_BR would be cool, then I don't have to put up with all that American > spelling :) I thought you'd be looking for en_OZ ... regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)---

Re: [HACKERS] Missing French backend translations in the HEAD

2004-08-10 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
(BTW, does a fr_CA version of it have a chance of being accepted? French here (in Canada) is still a bit different with its own specifics. Spelling-wise, the most notable difference is having CAPS with accents where fr_FR normally doesn't have (for corresponding lowercase accented letters) and spac

Re: [HACKERS] Missing French backend translations in the HEAD

2004-08-10 Thread Serguei A. Mokhov
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 20:51:52 +0200 > > Serguei A. Mokhov wrote: > > backend/po/fr.po had 99% translations done for 7.4, and nos it is > > totally missing for the current CVS tip (it is in the > > Attic)... why? Most of those messasge are st

Re: [HACKERS] Missing French backend translations in the HEAD

2004-08-10 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Serguei A. Mokhov wrote: > backend/po/fr.po had 99% translations done for 7.4, and nos it is > totally missing for the current CVS tip (it is in the > Attic)... why? Most of those messasge are still applicable to > the current, no? Commit message from you from 2 weeks ago says: The file ha