Re: [HACKERS] Minor improvement for inval.c header comment

2017-04-13 Thread Amit Langote
On 2017/04/13 18:09, Simon Riggs wrote: > On 13 April 2017 at 09:27, Amit Langote wrote: >> Attached patch modifies a sentence in the inval.c header comment to >> mention that operations on a pg_index tuple also registers relcache flush >> operation. > > Correctly observed. Patch pushed. Thanks.

Re: [HACKERS] Minor improvement for inval.c header comment

2017-04-13 Thread Simon Riggs
On 13 April 2017 at 09:27, Amit Langote wrote: > Attached patch modifies a sentence in the inval.c header comment to > mention that operations on a pg_index tuple also registers relcache flush > operation. Correctly observed. Patch pushed. -- Simon Riggshttp://www.2ndQuadrant.co