Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So I'm thinking it might be time to fix this. After checking the
>> code, it seems like it'd be a reasonably small patch if we establish
>> a convention that toast tables for a temp schema pg_temp_nnn are
>> kept
"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So I'm thinking it might be time to fix this. After checking the
> code, it seems like it'd be a reasonably small patch if we establish
> a convention that toast tables for a temp schema pg_temp_nnn are
> kept in an associated dedicated schema, named somet
