Re: [HACKERS] Making rpath a bit more flexible

2004-10-12 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Peter Eisentraut wrote: Am Montag, 11. Oktober 2004 22:31 schrieb Tom Lane: The problem of course is that we have no rpath pointing to the place where libperl.so lives. (Now that I look, the only reason this worked before was that I had /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/CORE mention

Re: [HACKERS] Making rpath a bit more flexible

2004-10-12 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> What I would like to do about this is change the platform-specific >> makefiles to provide these macros in the form >> rpath = -Wl,-rpath,$(rpathdir) > I have no problem with that. But are there going to be cases where we > need to point to more tha

Re: [HACKERS] Making rpath a bit more flexible

2004-10-11 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Am Montag, 11. Oktober 2004 22:31 schrieb Tom Lane: > The problem of course is that we have no rpath pointing to the place > where libperl.so lives. (Now that I look, the only reason this worked > before was that I had /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/CORE > mentioned in /etc/ld.so.con