On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 03:23:44PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
>> > As I pondered this, I felt it would do better to solve a different problem.
>> > The "rm -rf" invocations presumably cre
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 03:23:44PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
> > As I pondered this, I felt it would do better to solve a different problem.
> > The "rm -rf" invocations presumably crept in to reduce peak disk usage.
> > Considering the rel
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 02:59:55PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
>> > Solaris 10 ships Perl 5.8.4, and RHEL 5.11 ships Perl 5.8.8. Therefore,
>> > Perl
>> > installations lacking this File
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 02:59:55PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
> > Solaris 10 ships Perl 5.8.4, and RHEL 5.11 ships Perl 5.8.8. Therefore,
> > Perl
> > installations lacking this File::Path feature will receive vendor support
> > for
> > yea
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
> Solaris 10 ships Perl 5.8.4, and RHEL 5.11 ships Perl 5.8.8. Therefore, Perl
> installations lacking this File::Path feature will receive vendor support for
> years to come. Replacing the use of keep_root with rmtree+mkdir will add 2-10
> lines
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:29:36PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> David E. Wheeler wrote:
> > On Apr 14, 2015, at 1:21 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Castoroides has 5.8.4. Oops.
> >
> > WUT.
>
> Yeah, eh? Anyway I don't think it matters much: just don't enable TAP
> tests on machin
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 5:29 AM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> David E. Wheeler wrote:
>> On Apr 14, 2015, at 1:21 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>
>> > Castoroides has 5.8.4. Oops.
>>
>> WUT.
>
> Yeah, eh? Anyway I don't think it matters much: just don't enable TAP
> tests on machines with obsolete Perl
David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Apr 14, 2015, at 1:21 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> > Castoroides has 5.8.4. Oops.
>
> WUT.
Yeah, eh? Anyway I don't think it matters much: just don't enable TAP
tests on machines with obsolete Perl. I think this is fine since 5.8's
latest release is supported.
On Apr 14, 2015, at 1:21 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Castoroides has 5.8.4. Oops.
WUT.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Apr 14, 2015, at 9:05 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> >> http://perldoc.perl.org/File/Path.html
> >> With this formulation:
> >> remove_tree($tempdir, {keep_root => 1});
> >
> > Does Perl 5.8 have this?
>
> Yes, it does.
>
> http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/NWCLARK/p
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 09:25:33AM -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Apr 14, 2015, at 9:05 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> >> http://perldoc.perl.org/File/Path.html
> >> With this formulation:
> >> remove_tree($tempdir, {keep_root => 1});
> >
> > Does Perl 5.8 have this?
>
> Yes, it does.
>
>
On Apr 14, 2015, at 9:05 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> http://perldoc.perl.org/File/Path.html
>> With this formulation:
>> remove_tree($tempdir, {keep_root => 1});
>
> Does Perl 5.8 have this?
Yes, it does.
http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/NWCLARK/perl-5.8.9/lib/File/Path.pm
Best,
David
smim
Michael Paquier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed that src/bin/initdb/t/001_initdb.pl uses directly rm via a
> system() call like that:
> system_or_bail "rm -rf '$tempdir'/*";
>
> This way of doing is not portable, particularly on platforms that do
> not have rm like... Windows where the equivalent
13 matches
Mail list logo
