;;; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
;;; Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:22:14 +0900 (JST)
;;;
;;; ;;; However, that doesn't explain our OS
From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 00:45:19 -0400
;;; However, that doesn't explain our OS X problem. I added some debug
;;; printouts, and can now report positively that (a) the fork() call
;;; returns normally in the parent process, providing an apparently-correct
;;; ch
Peter Bierman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is fork() disallowed after shutdown starts?
>>
>> No, it's allowed. But, depending upon timing, the new process may be
>> hammered with a SIGTERM right away (maybe even before main()).
Good point. The fork is executed with SIGTERM blocked --- but the
At 1:26 AM -0400 4/30/02, Tom Lane wrote:
>I've been looking into Francois Suter's recent reports of Postgres not
>shutting down cleanly on Mac OS X 10.1.
>
>Now here's what I see in the case of shutting down the OS X system:
>
>2002-04-30 00:25:35 [376]DEBUG: pmdie 15
>2002-04-30 00:25:35 [3
I showed this to my friend who's a FreeBSD committer (Adrian Chadd) and he's
actually setting up a MacOS/X box at the moment and will look into it -
assuming you don't discover the problem first...
Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
