Le Mardi 3 Septembre 2002 04:28, Gerhard Häring a écrit :
> PostgreSQL will have a
> native win32 port,
Just out of interest, what is the advancement of the Windows port.
Best regards, Jean-Michel
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading
> Actually, Linux Journal (and their editors) are fans of PostgreSQL.
>
> This year, MySQL may actually have clued in to transactions and a few
> other big database features. I don't know that they actually *have*
> these features polished up, but LJ is giving them credit for trying...
It still d
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> Actually, Linux Journal (and their editors) are fans of PostgreSQL.
>
> This year, MySQL may actually have clued in to transactions and a few
> other big database features. I don't know that they actually *have*
> these features polished up, but LJ is giving them credit f
Actually, Linux Journal (and their editors) are fans of PostgreSQL.
This year, MySQL may actually have clued in to transactions and a few
other big database features. I don't know that they actually *have*
these features polished up, but LJ is giving them credit for trying...
-
* Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-03 10:17 +0800]:
> > On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> >
> > > Database: MySQL Honorable Mention: PostgresSQL
> >
> > Nothing wrong with that. From your list it seemed that in the categories
> > where there were competing op
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> >
> > > Database: MySQL Honorable Mention: PostgresSQL
> >
> > Nothing wrong with that. From your list it seemed that in the categories
> > where there were competing open source and open source/commercial back
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> database market now includes SapDB for crying out loud - how can MySQL (and
> even postgres really) compete with that? And what about Firebird? I think
And berkeley db. *Easily* the most widely used open source database and
the most profitab
> On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>
> > Database: MySQL Honorable Mention: PostgresSQL
>
> Nothing wrong with that. From your list it seemed that in the categories
> where there were competing open source and open source/commercial backed
> software then the latter seemed to win
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Database: MySQL Honorable Mention: PostgresSQL
Nothing wrong with that. From your list it seemed that in the categories
where there were competing open source and open source/commercial backed
software then the latter seemed to win over.
Thi
