On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 18:39 -0500, Decibel! wrote:
> On Jul 2, 2008, at 1:23 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> ... So it's just 7.3 that's worth debating, I think.
> >
> >> EOL is EOL, why is the question even being asked?
> >
> > Wel
On Jul 2, 2008, at 1:23 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
... So it's just 7.3 that's worth debating, I think.
EOL is EOL, why is the question even being asked?
Well, pg_dump still supports servers back to 7.0 (and yes I do test
that
now an
At 2008-07-02 09:16:30 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I don't think we should add support for pre-7.4 releases.
I agree. It's not worth the effort.
-- ams
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/m
Tom Lane a écrit :
I'm fooling around with Guillaume Lelarge's patch to make psql's \d
commands work with older server versions. The patch as submitted
works with servers back to 7.4 (modulo a small bug or two). I tried
to see what it'd take to make it work with 7.3. I count about a dozen
triv
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... So it's just 7.3 that's worth debating, I think.
> EOL is EOL, why is the question even being asked?
Well, pg_dump still supports servers back to 7.0 (and yes I do test that
now and again). psql probably doesn't need to suppo
Tom Lane wrote:
I'm fooling around with Guillaume Lelarge's patch to make psql's \d
commands work with older server versions. The patch as submitted
works with servers back to 7.4 (modulo a small bug or two). I tried
to see what it'd take to make it work with 7.3. I count about a dozen
trivial
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 22:33 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Pre-7.3 server versions seem entirely out of the realm of reason
> because they lack schema support, meaning all of those "pg_catalog."
> prefixes break, not to mention the joins to pg_namespace and the
> "schema" output columns. So it's just 7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
> I didn't see a simple fix right away. This seems a bit more work than
> is justified for a server version that the community has officially
> dropped support for, but I wonder if anyone feels hot about it?
>
> Pre-7.3 server versions seem ent
