Re: [HACKERS] Lifecycle management

2005-10-22 Thread Thomas Hallgren
Martijn, Thanks a lot. Your insights and pointers will help me a great deal. The answer to your question where I get HeapTupleHeader's from is that that's what a call-handler receive when you declare a function that takes complex parameters. Kind Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---

Re: [HACKERS] Lifecycle management

2005-10-22 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 10:09:12PM +0200, Thomas Hallgren wrote: > I guess some of my questions originate in lack of knowledge about the > rules you mention. I haven't been able to find documentation that > explains them thoroughly and I haven't been able to fully deduct it from > looking at the

Re: [HACKERS] Lifecycle management

2005-10-22 Thread Thomas Hallgren
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 01:49:16PM +0200, Thomas Hallgren wrote: PL/Java has gone through a series of stability improvements over the last couple of weeks. Now it's time to perhaps improve things even more but that requires a little help from PostgreSQL itself (

Re: [HACKERS] Lifecycle management

2005-10-22 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 01:49:16PM +0200, Thomas Hallgren wrote: > PL/Java has gone through a series of stability improvements over the > last couple of weeks. Now it's time to perhaps improve things even more > but that requires a little help from PostgreSQL itself (nothing related > to threads