Added to TODO:
* Allow more ISOLATION LEVELS to be accepted, but issue a
warning for them
---
Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think we could allow users to set the tra
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think we could allow users to set the transaction isolation level to
> READ UNCOMMITTED or REPEATABLE READ and internally behave like READ
> COMMITTED or SERIALIZABLE, respectively. The SQL standard seems to allow
> this:
My reading is that the spe
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I think we could allow users to set the transaction isolation level to
> READ UNCOMMITTED or REPEATABLE READ and internally behave like READ
> COMMITTED or SERIALIZABLE, respectively. The SQL standard seems to allow
> this:
Why not.
I would like a w
