Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> >
> >> One problem is that because system oids are used, it isn't possible to
> >> drop the language:
> >> I assume we still want to allow the language to be uninstalled, for
> >> security purposes.
> >>
> >
> > Yes.
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian writes:
One problem is that because system oids are used, it isn't possible to
drop the language:
I assume we still want to allow the language to be uninstalled, for
security purposes.
Yes. That behavior is not acceptable. Why aren't you just adding
a
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > One problem is that because system oids are used, it isn't possible to
> > drop the language:
> > I assume we still want to allow the language to be uninstalled, for
> > security purposes.
>
> Yes. That behavior is not acceptable. Why aren't you just
Bruce Momjian writes:
> One problem is that because system oids are used, it isn't possible to
> drop the language:
> I assume we still want to allow the language to be uninstalled, for
> security purposes.
Yes. That behavior is not acceptable. Why aren't you just adding
a CREATE LANGUAGE call
