On Sat, 30 Apr 2005, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 11:21:35PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
If money's not an issue anymore, can we get a bigger box to host
pgfoundry on then? :)
It's been done and is in the process of being brought up at a new colo
facility. There is also a backup b
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Regarding the secret code stuff - I predict that it will quickly bite
whoever does it, unless they are extremely lucky.
Yeah. Bruce and I were worrying about this on the phone today.
If a company is doing some work wit
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Regarding the secret code stuff - I predict that it will quickly bite
> > whoever does it, unless they are extremely lucky.
>
> Yeah. Bruce and I were worrying about this on the phone today.
> If a company is doing some work with t
Any ETA? I don't mean to harp, but it looks really bad when someone new
to postgresql comes to investigate something and the site is just
crawling.
Well the backup should come up in a couple of weeks. I know that the new
pgFoundry is being worked on right now. Josh would have a better idea.
Sincere
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 11:21:35PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >
> >
> >If money's not an issue anymore, can we get a bigger box to host
> >pgfoundry on then? :)
>
> It's been done and is in the process of being brought up at a new colo
> facility. There is also a backup box being built for f
If money's not an issue anymore, can we get a bigger box to host
pgfoundry on then? :)
It's been done and is in the process of being brought up at a new colo
facility. There is also a backup box being built for failover purposes ;)
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Command Prompt, Inc.
--
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 11:02:51PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Right now on the front page when we ask for support we are asking for
> people to donate money. We don't need money. We need people. The support
> link goes to bandwidth but a great deal of the project is hosted over
> many, many s
We'd like to avoid such unpleasant surprises, but how to get the word
out?
More prominent placement of how to contribute would probably help. The
PGF could help with this as well once it is done. Right now it is ether
on how to contribute unless you know where to look.
Right now on the front pa
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Regarding the secret code stuff - I predict that it will quickly bite
> whoever does it, unless they are extremely lucky.
Yeah. Bruce and I were worrying about this on the phone today.
If a company is doing some work with the intent that it's a propri
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> I've deliberately let the dust settle slightly on this.
>
> One thing that might help is a more open sponsorship "clearing house".
> Example (not meant as a bid, but just to illustrate): the JDBC driver
> needs a scanner overhaul - it breaks on dollar quoting and a bun
I've deliberately let the dust settle slightly on this.
One thing that might help is a more open sponsorship "clearing house".
Example (not meant as a bid, but just to illustrate): the JDBC driver
needs a scanner overhaul - it breaks on dollar quoting and a bunch of
other stuff. I could do that
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
However, there was a lot of coordination that happened with Fujitsu that
I don't see happening with the current companies involved. Companies
are already duplicating work that is also done by community members or
by other companies.
That is bound to happen no matter what. L
12 matches
Mail list logo
