On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Excerpts from Greg Smith's message of vie nov 19 01:52:34 -0300 2010:
>
>> I'd think that if configure takes
>> longer than it has to because the system is heavily loaded, the amount
>> compilation time is going to suffer from that would alw
Excerpts from Greg Smith's message of vie nov 19 01:52:34 -0300 2010:
> I'd think that if configure takes
> longer than it has to because the system is heavily loaded, the amount
> compilation time is going to suffer from that would always dwarf this
> component of total build time. But if thi
Gurjeet Singh wrote:
Seems like it would improve performance in general, but more so under
load conditions when you actually need it. I am not sure if -depth
option is supported by all incarnations of 'find'.
Given the way directory writes are cached by the filesystem, I'm not
sure why the lo
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
> > Excerpts from Gurjeet Singh's message of dom sep 26 22:15:59 -0400 2010:
> >> Currently I am seeing a performance improvement of this script by only
> about
> >> 500 ms; say 11.8 seconds vs. 11.3 secs. But I remember d
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> Excerpts from Gurjeet Singh's message of dom sep 26 22:15:59 -0400 2010:
>> Currently I am seeing a performance improvement of this script by only about
>> 500 ms; say 11.8 seconds vs. 11.3 secs. But I remember distinctly that
>> yesterday I was able to see an improvement
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Robert Haas writes:
>>> Well, the historical set of topics varies from CommitFest to
>>> CommitFest, by design. There are some that recur pretty regularly, of
>>> course, like Security, P
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>> Could this perhaps be made clearer on the page, perhaps with an example?
>>> It confused me recently too.
>>>
>>> Can you suggest something more specific?
>>>
>>> Well, it could say something like:
>>>
>>> The Message-ID can be found in t
Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of lun sep 27 11:28:33 -0400 2010:
> Another way to handle this might be to extract it from an http URL if
> given one.
+1 for this approach
--
Álvaro Herrera
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Develo
Excerpts from Gurjeet Singh's message of dom sep 26 22:15:59 -0400 2010:
> Currently I am seeing a performance improvement of this script by only about
> 500 ms; say 11.8 seconds vs. 11.3 secs. But I remember distinctly that
> yesterday I was able to see an improvement of 11% on the same virtual
>
On 09/27/2010 11:16 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 09/27/2010 10:39 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Andrew Dunstan
wrote:
On 09/27/2010 10:11 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
What should be the value of 'Message-ID for orig
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 09/27/2010 10:39 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Andrew Dunstan
> wrote:
>
> On 09/27/2010 10:11 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> What should be the value of 'Message-ID for original patch' ?
> the URL:
> http
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> Well, the historical set of topics varies from CommitFest to
>> CommitFest, by design. There are some that recur pretty regularly, of
>> course, like Security, Performance, and Miscellaneous. But not every
>> CF will hav
On 09/27/2010 10:39 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 09/27/2010 10:11 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
What should be the value of 'Message-ID for original patch' ?
the URL:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-09/msg01837.php
or the ID: a
Robert Haas writes:
> Well, the historical set of topics varies from CommitFest to
> CommitFest, by design. There are some that recur pretty regularly, of
> course, like Security, Performance, and Miscellaneous. But not every
> CF will have a section for ECPG or Refactoring, for example. In one
Tom Lane wrote:
> I liked the idea of pre-populating with the historical set of
> topics.
+1
-Kevin
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> Andrew's question seemed to be about the message-ID. I agree the
>> topic thing is confusing, though. I'm wondering if it would be
>> sufficient to do the following - if no topic are available, instead of
>> showing the
Robert Haas writes:
> Andrew's question seemed to be about the message-ID. I agree the
> topic thing is confusing, though. I'm wondering if it would be
> sufficient to do the following - if no topic are available, instead of
> showing the form, it says something like:
> No topics have been crea
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/27/2010 10:11 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>>
What should be the value of 'Message-ID for original patch' ?
the URL:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hacker
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 09/27/2010 10:11 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>>> What should be the value of 'Message-ID for original patch' ?
>>> the URL:
>>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-09/msg01837.php
>>> or the ID: aanlktinw0hl+jqmrtwxc9y2tq
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 09/27/2010 10:11 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>
>>
>> What should be the value of 'Message-ID for original patch' ?
>>> the URL:
>>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-09/msg01837.php
>>> or the ID:
>>> aanlktinw0hl+jqmrtw
On 09/27/2010 10:11 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
What should be the value of 'Message-ID for original patch' ?
the URL: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-09/msg01837.php
or the ID: aanlktinw0hl+jqmrtwxc9y2tqhcfhfgfekxyyfygv...@mail.gmail.com
The latter.
Could this perhaps be mad
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Gurjeet Singh
>> wrote:
>> > I have been away from Postgres development for quite a while, so would
>> > appreciate if someone could tell me if suc
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Gurjeet Singh
> wrote:
> > I have been away from Postgres development for quite a while, so would
> > appreciate if someone could tell me if such a patch should be submitted
> for
> > commitfest (since this i
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> I have been away from Postgres development for quite a while, so would
> appreciate if someone could tell me if such a patch should be submitted for
> commitfest (since this is not actually a source patch).
By all means add it to the open C
24 matches
Mail list logo
