Tom Lane wrote:
> Hmm ... I suppose the implication of that is that the upstream zic
> files *are* architecture-independent, else people wouldn't keep them
> in /share; and looking at the code, it does seem some effort is made
> in that direction.
With that in mind, I have installed the original c
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm not real thrilled with the notion of trying to use a zic built by
>> a different compiler; I think that will lead to all sorts of
>> problems, considering that the files it's meant to write are binary
>> and at least potentially
Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm not real thrilled with the notion of trying to use a zic built by
> a different compiler; I think that will lead to all sorts of
> problems, considering that the files it's meant to write are binary
> and at least potentially architecture-specific.
Btw., in light of that the
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Montag, 30. Mai 2005 20:11 schrieb Tom Lane:
>> Why don't we instead arrange to run it during install?
> It does currently run during the install. How does that help?
I'm sorry, I meant "later than it is now". Presumably the person doing
the cro
Am Montag, 30. Mai 2005 20:11 schrieb Tom Lane:
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The problem is that the program zic in src/timezone/ is built and run
> > during the build process, which doesn't work if it's compiled by a
> > cross-compiler.
>
> Why don't we instead arrange to run
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem is that the program zic in src/timezone/ is built and run
> during the build process, which doesn't work if it's compiled by a
> cross-compiler.
Why don't we instead arrange to run it during install?
I'm not real thrilled with the notio
What about our threading configure test? That doesn't allow cross
compilation either, does it?
---
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> In 8.0, PostgreSQL lost its previously postulated ability to be
> cross-compiled and it turns out
