On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:11 AM, Joshua Tolley wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 03:42:56PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Joshua Tolley wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 08:41:27AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> >> As far as I'm aware, there's been no code
>> >> review yet
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 03:42:56PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Joshua Tolley wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 08:41:27AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> >> As far as I'm aware, there's been no code
> >> review yet either, which would probably be a good idea.
> >
> > I don'
David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 09:12:55AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > On Saturday 04 July 2009 00:54:11 Robert Haas wrote:
> > > > I think what would be more useful is if we could
> > > > somehow associated metadata with each commit. Right now, for
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 09:12:55AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On Saturday 04 July 2009 00:54:11 Robert Haas wrote:
> > > I think what would be more useful is if we could
> > > somehow associated metadata with each commit. Right now, for example,
> > > the author of a
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Saturday 04 July 2009 00:54:11 Robert Haas wrote:
> > I think what would be more useful is if we could
> > somehow associated metadata with each commit. Right now, for example,
> > the author of a patch is not stored with the patch in any structured
> > way; it's just
On Saturday 04 July 2009 00:54:11 Robert Haas wrote:
> I think what would be more useful is if we could
> somehow associated metadata with each commit. Right now, for example,
> the author of a patch is not stored with the patch in any structured
> way; it's just typed in, usually but not always a
Ron Mayer wrote:
Josh Berkus wrote:
Folks,...the first CF on July 15th.
Would it make the CommitFest easier if there were an additional
column which indicates what CVS-version of Postgres the patch
cleanly applies to?
Perhaps a patch submitter could indicate the CVS date/time
with which he
Josh Berkus wrote:
Folks,...the first CF on July 15th.
Would it make the CommitFest easier if there were an additional
column which indicates what CVS-version of Postgres the patch
cleanly applies to?
Perhaps a patch submitter could indicate the CVS date/time
with which he developed the patch.
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> Robert Haas píše v čt 02. 07. 2009 v 22:16 -0400:
>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
>
>> Also, how would we handle changes by committers, who
>> don't always go through the CommitFest process?
>
> I think that all head pat
"Dickson S. Guedes" wrote:
> pgcommitfest tables sctructure [1]?
>
> [1]
>
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgcommitfest.git;a=blob;f=etc/table.sql;h=c60a298c863ef3e88dcfd16572781d2b435ca629;hb=HEAD
On minor quibble with this schema: I believe that session.login_time
should be TIMESTAMP
Robert Haas píše v čt 02. 07. 2009 v 22:16 -0400:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> Also, how would we handle changes by committers, who
> don't always go through the CommitFest process?
I think that all head patches should go to through a new tool for
recording also in ca
Peter Eisentraut píše v pá 03. 07. 2009 v 09:19 +0300:
> On Friday 03 July 2009 05:16:41 Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> > > Josh Berkus píše v st 01. 07. 2009 v 17:21 -0700:
> > >> Folks,
> > >>
> > >> There's been a lot of discussion/argument around
On Friday 03 July 2009 05:16:41 Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> > Josh Berkus píše v st 01. 07. 2009 v 17:21 -0700:
> >> Folks,
> >>
> >> There's been a lot of discussion/argument around how to handle the last
> >> commitfest, but there seems to be a tota
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
>
> Josh Berkus píše v st 01. 07. 2009 v 17:21 -0700:
>> Folks,
>>
>> There's been a lot of discussion/argument around how to handle the last
>> commitfest, but there seems to be a total consensus that we want to have
>> the first CF on July 15th
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Greg Stark wrote:
> So I currently have some free time as I'm currently between jobs. I
> can start going through the queued patches in the next few weeks.
> Should I be looking at the wiki currently? Or is your tool ready to
> go?
Wiki for now. Brendan Jurd is wor
So I currently have some free time as I'm currently between jobs. I
can start going through the queued patches in the next few weeks.
Should I be looking at the wiki currently? Or is your tool ready to
go?
--
greg
http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-
Josh Berkus píše v st 01. 07. 2009 v 17:21 -0700:
> Folks,
>
> There's been a lot of discussion/argument around how to handle the last
> commitfest, but there seems to be a total consensus that we want to have
> the first CF on July 15th.
Can we add flags like bump catalog version, bump page l
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Joshua Tolley wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 03:42:56PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Joshua Tolley wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 08:41:27AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> >> As far as I'm aware, there's been no code
>> >> review yet
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 03:42:56PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Joshua Tolley wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 08:41:27AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> >> As far as I'm aware, there's been no code
> >> review yet either, which would probably be a good idea.
> >
> > I don'
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Dickson S. Guedes wrote:
> Em Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:15:22 -0300, Robert Haas
> escreveu:
>>
>> The main problem is that my fine software only contains test data at
>> this point. If we have any volunteers who are available to migrate
>> the information from the Wiki
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>> Suggest a suitable name by which we can address the service (we don't
>> use the internal names like coridan because things can get moved
>> around), and I can set that up in a few minutes.
>
>
Em Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:15:22 -0300, Robert Haas
escreveu:
The main problem is that my fine software only contains test data at
this point. If we have any volunteers who are available to migrate
the information from the Wiki to my app (which will involve a fair
amount of legwork), then I recomm
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Joshua Tolley wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 08:41:27AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> As far as I'm aware, there's been no code
>> review yet either, which would probably be a good idea.
>
> I don't have loads of time in the coming days, but IIRC I've taken a glance a
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 08:41:27AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> As far as I'm aware, there's been no code
> review yet either, which would probably be a good idea.
I don't have loads of time in the coming days, but IIRC I've taken a glance at
a past version of the code, and would be willing to do so
Em Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:26:14 -0300, Brendan Jurd
escreveu:
I imagine that "migration" would basically be converting the wiki data
into SQL, so I would need the database schema underlying the new CF
app.
How about parsing wiki content and create a "migration script" based on
pgcommitfest table
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Dave Page wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Jul 2, 2009, at 3:41 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>>
Robert, I have not reviewed your software. Do I need a login or
something?
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Jul 2, 2009, at 3:41 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>
>>> Robert, I have not reviewed your software. Do I need a login or
>>> something?
>>
>> It's not in productions yet as It's not been docum
On Jul 2, 2009, at 3:41 AM, Dave Page wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
Robert, I have not reviewed your software. Do I need a login or
something?
It's not in productions yet as It's not been documented or given a
public hostname/servicename, both of which are requ
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Robert, I have not reviewed your software. Do I need a login or something?
It's not in productions yet as It's not been documented or given a
public hostname/servicename, both of which are requirements for any
postgresql.org services. As far a
2009/7/2 Robert Haas :
> The main problem is that my fine software only contains test data at
> this point. If we have any volunteers who are available to migrate
> the information from the Wiki to my app (which will involve a fair
> amount of legwork),
As the original author of the CF wiki templ
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> There's been a lot of discussion/argument around how to handle the last
> commitfest, but there seems to be a total consensus that we want to have the
> first CF on July 15th.
>
> I'd like Robert Haas to be the CF Manager for that commitfest if h
31 matches
Mail list logo
