Re: [HACKERS] Fate of the old cvs repository

2010-11-19 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 19:15, David Fetter wrote: > On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 05:54:04PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> So, it seems we're pretty firmly on git now, and I doubt we're ever >> going to shift back now :) >> >> That means I'd like to get the two CVS VMs shut down (that's >> cvs.postg

Re: [HACKERS] Fate of the old cvs repository

2010-10-17 Thread Joshua D. Drake
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 17:54 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > So, it seems we're pretty firmly on git now, and I doubt we're ever > going to shift back now :) > > That means I'd like to get the two CVS VMs shut down (that's > cvs.postgresql.org and anoncvs.postgresql.org), so we don't have to > atte

Re: [HACKERS] Fate of the old cvs repository

2010-10-17 Thread David Fetter
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 05:54:04PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > So, it seems we're pretty firmly on git now, and I doubt we're ever > going to shift back now :) > > That means I'd like to get the two CVS VMs shut down (that's > cvs.postgresql.org and anoncvs.postgresql.org), so we don't have to