Re: [HACKERS] FW: Cygwin PostgreSQL Information and Suggestions

2002-05-12 Thread Jason Tishler
Joel, On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 12:43:16PM -0400, Joel Burton wrote: > > > Sorry, but since I install all Cygwin packages plus about 30 > > > additional ones I haven't desire to determine what are the > > > minimal requirements. > > If no one else has done this, I'll be happy to dig in and answer

Re: [HACKERS] FW: Cygwin PostgreSQL Information and Suggestions

2002-05-10 Thread Joel Burton
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Lane > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 12:31 PM > To: Dave Page > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] FW: Cygwin PostgreSQL Information and Suggestio

Re: [HACKERS] FW: Cygwin PostgreSQL Information and Suggestions

2002-05-10 Thread Joel Burton
> > 1. Cygwin's setup.exe supports categories and dependencies. > > Hence, there is no reason to install all Cygwin packages in > > order to ensure properly PostgreSQL operation. Someone just > > has to determine what is the minimal set of packages > > necessary for PostgreSQL and I will update t

Re: [HACKERS] FW: Cygwin PostgreSQL Information and Suggestions

2002-05-10 Thread Tom Lane
"Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> forwards: > 4. Cygwin PostgreSQL is perceived to have poor performance. I have > never done any benchmarks regarding this issue, but apparently Terry > Carlin (from the defunct Great Bridge) did: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-cygwin/2001-08/msg00029.p