Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I see in configure.in:
> *** If you are going to modify the grammar files or build from CVS, the
> installed
> *** version of Bison is too old. Bison version 1.875 or later is required.])
> Looks documented to me.
Also, installation.sgml s
Josh Berkus wrote:
Aha. Yeah, blew past me too fast to read. Hmmm ... does that mean that this
error won't happen in the release version?
You shoouldn't need bison at all with a release tarball -- the
preprocessed grammar file is distributed with it.
Joe
---(end of bro
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> > *** If you are going to modify the grammar files or build from CVS, the
> > installed *** version of Bison is too old. Bison version 1.875 or later is
> > required.]) fi
> > fi
>
> Aha. Yeah, blew past me too fast to read. Hmmm ... does that mean that
Bruce,
> *** If you are going to modify the grammar files or build from CVS, the
> installed *** version of Bison is too old. Bison version 1.875 or later is
> required.]) fi
> fi
Aha. Yeah, blew past me too fast to read. Hmmm ... does that mean that this
error won't happen in the
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Update on this: Just tried it with:
> SuSE 9.1, GCC 3.3.3, Bison 1.875
> and don't get the error.
>
> So it looks like the requirement for Bison 1.85+ is now a "hard" requirement?
> We'll need to document this, since SuSE 9.0 is less than a year old, and I'm
>
Folks,
Update on this: Just tried it with:
SuSE 9.1, GCC 3.3.3, Bison 1.875
and don't get the error.
So it looks like the requirement for Bison 1.85+ is now a "hard" requirement?
We'll need to document this, since SuSE 9.0 is less than a year old, and I'm
sure some other distros are still usi
