Kovacs Zoltan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I think not. The current implementation of LIMIT fetches one more row
>> than is really needed, IIRC.
> Tom, the real problem is that I get _different_ output for
The point is that the problem is probably in the 23rd row of pg_class,
not the 22nd.
Kovacs Zoltan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It means that the 21st line of the result is problematic, because writing
> 20 instead of 21 I got no problem.
I think not. The current implementation of LIMIT fetches one more row
than is really needed, IIRC.
regards, tom lane
Kovacs Zoltan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Starting pg_dump, this error occured (there is no output dump,
> unfortunately). Getting closer, I got this:
> tir=# SELECT pg_get_viewdef(c.relname) AS definition FROM pg_class c
> offset 441 limit 1;
> ERROR: cache lookup for proc 4303134 failed
I t
