On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 08:28:57AM -0800, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> desc.pgc:55: WARNING: descriptor ""outdesc"" does not exist
> desc.pgc:86: WARNING: descriptor ""outdesc"" does not exist
Thanks, I didn't notice, fixed.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes do
Robert Haas writes:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This seems like a build-process bug, not a .gitignore oversight.
>> Those shouldn't be there at all (and I notice "make clean" doesn't
>> get rid of them).
> I don't even know what they are.
"Outboard" debug symbols.
So
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> After running "make installcheck-world", git status shows a bunch of
>> stuff that looks like this:
>
>> # src/interfaces/ecpg/test/sql/desc.dSYM/
>> # src/interfaces/ecpg/test/sql/describe.dSYM/
>> # src/interfaces/
Robert Haas writes:
> After running "make installcheck-world", git status shows a bunch of
> stuff that looks like this:
> # src/interfaces/ecpg/test/sql/desc.dSYM/
> # src/interfaces/ecpg/test/sql/describe.dSYM/
> # src/interfaces/ecpg/test/sql/dynalloc.dSYM/
> # src/interfaces/ecpg/test
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 05:44:22PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> >
> >Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >>>(Hint: if you don't put the PlatformSDK directories first in the
> >>>INCLUDE and LIB lists bad and inexplicable things can happen.)
> >>>
> >>>Pick up the latest ve
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Magnus Hagander wrote:
(Hint: if you don't put the PlatformSDK directories first in the
INCLUDE and LIB lists bad and inexplicable things can happen.)
Pick up the latest version of run_build.pl in CVS if you want to run
this in your buildfarm animal now.
A release
Magnus Hagander wrote:
(Hint: if you don't put the PlatformSDK
directories first in the INCLUDE and LIB lists bad and inexplicable
things can happen.)
Pick up the latest version of run_build.pl in CVS if you want to run
this in your buildfarm animal now.
A release will be forthcoming very
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 11:50:39PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> >
> >Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >>Bingo.
> >>
> >>With that, all the ECPG regression tests now pass on MSVC builds.
> >>
> >>Andrew - please enable it for the buildfarm :-)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Yes,
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Magnus Hagander wrote:
Bingo.
With that, all the ECPG regression tests now pass on MSVC builds.
Andrew - please enable it for the buildfarm :-)
Yes, when I have had a chance to test it. Might be a day or so.
I finally managed to get this working after much
Magnus Hagander wrote:
Bingo.
With that, all the ECPG regression tests now pass on MSVC builds.
Andrew - please enable it for the buildfarm :-)
Yes, when I have had a chance to test it. Might be a day or so.
cheers
andrew
---(end of broadcast)
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 02:34:59PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> With that, all the ECPG regression tests now pass on MSVC builds.
Great!
Thanks a lot for your help Magnus.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AI
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 02:12:50PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 01:54:50PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Getting much further now - now they all build :-) But I'm getting a couple
> > of failures in autoprep and oldexec. Diffs attached.
> >
> > Pointers?
>
> Looks l
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 01:54:50PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Getting much further now - now they all build :-) But I'm getting a couple
> of failures in autoprep and oldexec. Diffs attached.
>
> Pointers?
Looks like we're almost there.
oldexec needs the additional option "-r questionmarks
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 02:04:48PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 07:30:21PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > If you want to pick one early, please look at the one about the thread
> > regression tests not appearing to run at all. I'd like to have that
> > confirmed before
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 07:30:21PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> If you want to pick one early, please look at the one about the thread
> regression tests not appearing to run at all. I'd like to have that
> confirmed before I try to dig into how to fix it - in case it's not
> actually broken, an
Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 06:13:03PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> If I change the code in one of the ecpg regression tests (porting tests as
>> well to non-pthread win32), am I supposed to manually change the .c files
>> in the expected directory? Or is ther some other pro
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 06:13:03PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> If I change the code in one of the ecpg regression tests (porting tests as
> well to non-pthread win32), am I supposed to manually change the .c files
> in the expected directory? Or is ther some other process for it?
Just run the
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... However, I tried reverting the
>> change and things still did not work. The reason is that the test
>> programs are built with relative paths to libpq that look like
>> ../../../../../src/interfaces/libpq/libpq.sl.5
> This is
Tom Lane wrote:
> AFAICT, every buildfarm machine that runs ecpg tests has been failing
> since Peter's patch here:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-01/msg00241.php
>
> Now it looks to me like Peter was simply wrong: we do need to include
> libpq because libecpg depends on it.
19 matches
Mail list logo
