Re: [HACKERS] ecpg compile error

2010-01-06 Thread Michael Meskes
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 09:42:06AM +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote: > Attached. Passes "make check" here on 32-bit and > 64-bit builds under Fedora 9/x86-64. Applied. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Me

Re: [HACKERS] ecpg compile error

2010-01-06 Thread Michael Meskes
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 09:49:27PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I am seeing a compile failure in current CVS because my operating > system, BSD/OS, does not have inttypes.h: Sorry, missed this. I did remove it in another file, but didn't notice it's here too. Should be fixed now that I committed

Re: [HACKERS] ecpg compile error

2010-01-06 Thread Boszormenyi Zoltan
Boszormenyi Zoltan írta: > Bruce Momjian írta: > >> Bruce Momjian wrote: >> >> >>> I am seeing a compile failure in current CVS because my operating >>> system, BSD/OS, does not have inttypes.h: >>> >>> ccache gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith >>> -fno-strict-ali

Re: [HACKERS] ecpg compile error

2010-01-06 Thread Boszormenyi Zoltan
Bruce Momjian írta: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> I am seeing a compile failure in current CVS because my operating >> system, BSD/OS, does not have inttypes.h: >> >> ccache gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith >> -fno-strict-aliasing -O1 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes >>

Re: [HACKERS] ecpg compile error

2010-01-05 Thread Bruce Momjian
Bruce Momjian wrote: > I am seeing a compile failure in current CVS because my operating > system, BSD/OS, does not have inttypes.h: > > ccache gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith > -fno-strict-aliasing -O1 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes > -Wmissing-declarations -Wpoin

Re: [HACKERS] ecpg compile error in regression tests

2007-06-12 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 09:57:17AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 07:03:05PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > I get the following error when trying to build the sql/parser.pgc test: > > c:\prog\pgbin\pgsql\bin\ecpg --regression -o parser.c parser.pgc > > parser.pgc

Re: [HACKERS] ecpg compile error in regression tests

2007-06-12 Thread Michael Meskes
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 07:03:05PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > I get the following error when trying to build the sql/parser.pgc test: > c:\prog\pgbin\pgsql\bin\ecpg --regression -o parser.c parser.pgc > parser.pgc:26: ERROR: syntax error at or near "NULLS" > > Any pointers for where

Re: [HACKERS] ECPG compile error

2003-06-25 Thread Rod Taylor
> Anyway, if you have and it appears you also have HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64 > defined, which header file does provide the approprioate constants and > how is it named? It seems INT_MIN etc. are there. Sorry, limits.h includes machine/limits.h. Which (after a fresh cvsup), I have your earlier fix. -

Re: [HACKERS] ECPG compile error

2003-06-25 Thread Rod Taylor
> Anyway, if you have and it appears you also have HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64 > defined, which header file does provide the approprioate constants and > how is it named? It seems INT_MIN etc. are there. /usr/include/machine/limits.h seems to have INT_MIN, etc. in them. -- Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [HACKERS] ECPG compile error

2003-06-25 Thread Michael Meskes
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 11:51:47AM -0400, Rod Taylor wrote: > misc.c: In function `ECPGset_informix_null': > misc.c:272: `LONG_LONG_MIN' undeclared (first use in this function) > misc.c:272: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > misc.c:272: for each function it appears in.) > misc.c: