Bruce Momjian writes:
> I am not sure about the idea of -g by default. I know lyx uses -g by
> default, and the compile/install takes forever. In fact, I have removed
> -g from my compiles here because it takes too long to compile/link and I
> do it too often. When I need to debug, I recompile
I am not sure about the idea of -g by default. I know lyx uses -g by
default, and the compile/install takes forever. In fact, I have removed
-g from my compiles here because it takes too long to compile/link and I
do it too often. When I need to debug, I recompile with -g. My concern
is that w
> We had discussed a while ago that it might be a good idea to compile with
> debugging symbols by default, at least when using GCC.
A tricky questions is what to do with the --enable-debug option. For GCC
it would become --disable-debug (i.e., remove -g from CFLAGS), but I'm not
sure we'd need
Larry Rosenman writes:
> On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 16:55, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > We had discussed a while ago that it might be a good idea to compile with
> > debugging symbols by default, at least when using GCC. Personally, I
^^
> With t
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 16:55, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> We had discussed a while ago that it might be a good idea to compile with
> debugging symbols by default, at least when using GCC. Personally, I
> think that that would be a good idea, for users and developers alike.
>
> If we go with that,
