Re: [HACKERS] Copyright (C) 1996-2002

2004-01-30 Thread Randolf Richardson
"[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Michel POURE)" stated in comp.databases.postgresql.hackers: > Le Mardi 25 Novembre 2003 07:32, Randolf Richardson a écrit : >> I'm curious, has anyone consulted with a lawyer on this? > > Yes, the lawyer concluded that the number "2003" had been both > registered as a tr

Re: [HACKERS] Copyright (C) 1996-2002

2003-12-02 Thread Jean-Michel POURE
Le Mardi 25 Novembre 2003 07:32, Randolf Richardson a Ãcrit : > I'm curious, has anyone consulted with a lawyer on this? Yes, the lawyer concluded that the number "2003" had been both registered as a trademark and a patented invention. Therefore, it is very likely that Humanity will be able to j

Re: [HACKERS] Copyright (C) 1996-2002

2003-11-28 Thread Randolf Richardson
>> Today I've d-loaded PostgreSQL 7.3.4. >> I've seen in >> $PGSQLD/doc/html/index.html >> it still says >> Copyright (C) 1996-2002 >> shouldn't it be 2003? > > We only update the copyright notices when we are preparing a major > release. (Bruce just did it a week or two back for 7.4, for example

Re: [HACKERS] Copyright (C) 1996-2002

2003-08-15 Thread Tom Lane
Christoph Haller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Today I've d-loaded PostgreSQL 7.3.4. > I've seen in > $PGSQLD/doc/html/index.html > it still says > Copyright (C) 1996-2002 > shouldn't it be 2003? We only update the copyright notices when we are preparing a major release. (Bruce just did it a week