Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
I'm very strongly in favor of having this documentation. However, I think
it might make sense to put "Contrib Modules" as a section under either
"Reference" or "Appendices". Also, I don't think it's necessary to make
each command option a separate subchapter, but
>
> I'm very strongly in favor of having this documentation. However, I think
> it might make sense to put "Contrib Modules" as a section under either
> "Reference" or "Appendices". Also, I don't think it's necessary to make
> each command option a separate subchapter, but I can see how that woul
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Josh Berkus wrote:
Further, you know we don't finish the docs until beta. Ever.
In that context, as long as the documentation cleanup doesn't slow the
schedule for when beta starts I think it would be a great thing to slip
into 8.3. In fact, if those are going higher-p
Josh Berkus wrote:
Having the contrib stuff in the main docs would remove one of the largest barriers
to people knowing about the contrib features.
Using PostgreSQL since Version 7.1.3 and reading this List since - I
dont't know exactly but my current archives start in 2003 which was the
la
Josh Berkus wrote:
Greg,
Are you suggesting to add an additional piece of work to the already
behind schedule 8.3 timeline when there's already this idea floating
around to overhaul the entire contrib structure in 8.4, which may very
well make much of that work redundant? Albert's work is
Greg,
> Are you suggesting to add an additional piece of work to the already
> behind schedule 8.3 timeline when there's already this idea floating
> around to overhaul the entire contrib structure in 8.4, which may very
> well make much of that work redundant? Albert's work is cool and all, but
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Josh Berkus wrote:
Guys, would it be out of the question to do this in 8.3? Please please?
Are you suggesting to add an additional piece of work to the already
behind schedule 8.3 timeline when there's already this idea floating
around to overhaul the entire contrib str
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 10:09:07AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Albert,
>
> (crossed over to -docs, where it really belongs)
>
> > I've been working on converting the current README files for all contrib
> > modules into sgml and add it to the documentation. There are still some
> > fixes to do bu
Albert,
(crossed over to -docs, where it really belongs)
> I've been working on converting the current README files for all contrib
> modules into sgml and add it to the documentation. There are still some
> fixes to do but i'd like to have some feedback. Indeed, it wasn't agreed to
> have all if
There is a problem with line feeds for contrib/xml2:
http://www.nan-tic.com/ftp/pgdoc/xml2.html
As for idea itself, I find it very useful (besides usability
improvements, it would help to promote Postgres advanced features).
On 8/29/07, Albert Cervera i Areny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've bee
10 matches
Mail list logo
