Hannu,
> RAID10
>
> "Throughput report Y-axis is type of test X-axis is number of processes"
> "Record size = 8 Kbytes "
> "Output is in ops/sec"
> " Initial write "1352.90
> "Rewrite " 413.31
> RAID5
>
> "Throughput report Y-axis is type of test X-axis is number of processes"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Jeffrey W. Baker") wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 21:38 -0700, Luke Lonergan wrote:
> After reading this very comprehensive benchmark:
>
> http://print.tweakers.net/?reviews/557
>
> I purchased one of the Areca controllers with a large battery-backed
> cache. It is unholy fast.
On T, 2005-05-31 at 17:08 +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> Luke Lonergan wrote:
> > Tom,
> >
> > This is a story that is evolving. Anyone else use StorageReview? Great
> > comprehensive drive benchmarks:
> > http://www.storagereview.com/
> >
> > Check the comparisons between 15K RPM SCSI drives
Jeff,
> If we're looking at the same benchmark (File Server DriveMark), the
> fastest SCSI disk is 65% faster than the fastest SATA disk. The fastest
> SCSI 10K disk is 25% faster than the SATA.
I think it's misleading to compare drives on the basis of one benchmark.
One of the things I like a
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 21:38 -0700, Luke Lonergan wrote:
> Tom,
>
> This is a story that is evolving. Anyone else use StorageReview? Great
> comprehensive drive benchmarks:
> http://www.storagereview.com/
>
> Check the comparisons between 15K RPM SCSI drives and the 2004 Western
> Digital 10K
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Luke Lonergan wrote:
Although the benchmark numbers are pretty good, they have only published
(what looks like) results for sequential IO. It would be interesting to
see the random ones, as this would tell us how effective the TCQ
implementation is.
Referring to 3ware'
Luke Lonergan wrote:
Tom,
This is a story that is evolving. Anyone else use StorageReview? Great
comprehensive drive benchmarks:
http://www.storagereview.com/
Check the comparisons between 15K RPM SCSI drives and the 2004 Western
Digital 10K RPM SATA (Raptor) drives. The Raptors are an int
Tom,
This is a story that is evolving. Anyone else use StorageReview? Great
comprehensive drive benchmarks:
http://www.storagereview.com/
Check the comparisons between 15K RPM SCSI drives and the 2004 Western
Digital 10K RPM SATA (Raptor) drives. The Raptors are an interesting hybrid
of SCSI
Yea, it is a great paper. It is an HTML version of the SCSI PDF I
mentioned a few weeks ago:
http://www.seagate.com/content/docs/pdf/whitepaper/D2c_More_than_Interface_ATA_vs_SCSI_042003.pdf
Someone had mentioned it on the lists a few months ago but I only read
it recently and resugges
