On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2015-08-17 14:31:24 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> The postmaster process in particular runs in a rather unusual
>> arrangement, where most of the interesting stuff does happen in signal
>> handlers.
>
> FWIW, I think it might be worthwhi
On 2015-08-17 14:31:24 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> The postmaster process in particular runs in a rather unusual
> arrangement, where most of the interesting stuff does happen in signal
> handlers.
FWIW, I think it might be worthwhile to convert postmaster into a loop
over a process local latch
On 2015-08-17 07:37:45 +, Ewan Higgs wrote:
> So I changed volatile to _Atomic and continued (patch is in
> thread_test_atomic.patch). I then ran it against sqlsmith. The good
> news: I didn't happen to find any problems in normal use. The bad
> news: I did find a lot of warnings about improper
Ewan Higgs wrote:
> So I changed volatile to _Atomic and continued (patch is in
> thread_test_atomic.patch). I then ran it against sqlsmith. The good
> news: I didn't happen to find any problems in normal use. The bad
> news: I did find a lot of warnings about improper use of functions
> like mall
