* Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [19.04.2005 19:48]:
> That's probably what you *have* to use, since the normal deconstructors
> assume they are working with heap tuples, which are different. But I
> don't understand why you are waiting till after the index tuple is
> formed. The aminsert function
"Victor Y. Yegorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, I'd like to ask -- what is the "reverse" function for heap_fill_tuple(),
> is it OK to use index_getattr()?
That's probably what you *have* to use, since the normal deconstructors
assume they are working with heap tuples, which are different.
