On Dec 19, 2009, at 4:07 AM, Dave Page wrote:
Thanks Greg - nice job! :-)
+1!
...Robert
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Thanks Greg - nice job! :-)
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Greg Smith wrote:
> CommitFest 2009-11 is now closed, having committed 27 patches in 33 days.
> For comparison sake, 2009-09 committed 20 patches in 29 days, 2009-07 37
> patches in 34 days, and 2008-09 29 patches in 30 days. The much
CommitFest 2009-11 is now closed, having committed 27 patches in 33
days. For comparison sake, 2009-09 committed 20 patches in 29 days,
2009-07 37 patches in 34 days, and 2008-09 29 patches in 30 days. The
much bigger 2008-11 involved 58 patches going on for months, the bulk of
it committed 2
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 Greg Smith wrote:
Sounds like we just are waiting for Simon to finish up, which is
expected to happen by tomorrow, and for Tom to wrap up working on the
ProcessUtility_hook. That makes the first reasonable date to consider
alpha3 packaging Thursday 12/17 I think.
Update:
Greg Smith writes:
> We're down to five patches that are ready for a committer still on the
> table:
> -tsearch parser inefficiency with urls or emails
I just looked at this one and concluded that it was pretty harmless;
will commit it.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via p
On Tuesday 15 December 2009 20:44:36 Greg Smith wrote:
> As for the tsearch improvements, not to trivialize the patch, but I
> think this one will survive being committed between alpha3 & CF 2010-01
> if it doesn't make it in this week. Teodor can work on getting that
> committed when he has time,
Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
-New VACUUM FULL
I get the impression there is still some discussion that needs to
happen about the design of this. I think we should mark it Returned
with Feedback for now, and let whoever ends up working on it r
Greg Smith writes:
> We're down to five patches that are ready for a committer still on the
> table:
> -New VACUUM FULL
> -tsearch parser inefficiency with urls or emails
> -ProcessUtility_hook
> -Aggregate ORDER BY support
> -Hot Standby
Aggregate ORDER BY is in. I will pick up the ProcessUti
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
> -New VACUUM FULL
I get the impression there is still some discussion that needs to
happen about the design of this. I think we should mark it Returned
with Feedback for now, and let whoever ends up working on it resubmit
whatever ends up gett
